NHS Digital Data Release Register - reformatted
NHS Bradford City Ccg projects
275 data files in total were disseminated unsafely (information about files used safely is missing for TRE/"system access" projects).
🚩 NHS Bradford City Ccg was sent multiple files from the same dataset, in the same month, both with optouts respected and with optouts ignored. NHS Bradford City Ccg may not have compared the two files, but the identifiers are consistent between datasets, and outside of a good TRE NHS Digital can not know what recipients actually do.
DSfC - NHS Bradford City CCG - IV & RS — DARS-NIC-90638-Q3T5B
Type of data: information not disclosed for TRE projects
Opt outs honoured: Y, No - data flow is not identifiable, Yes - patient objections upheld, Identifiable (Section 251, Section 251 NHS Act 2006)
Legal basis: Section 251 approval is in place for the flow of identifiable data, Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(1) and s261(2)(b)(ii), National Health Service Act 2006 - s251 - 'Control of patient information'. , Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(7), Health and Social Care Act 2012 s261(7)
Purposes: No (Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG), Sub ICB Location)
Sensitive: Sensitive
When:DSA runs 2019-09-18 — 2022-09-17 2018.06 — 2020.07.
Access method: Frequent adhoc flow, Frequent Adhoc Flow
Data-controller type: NHS BRADFORD DISTRICT AND CRAVEN CCG, NHS WEST YORKSHIRE ICB - 36J
Sublicensing allowed: No
Datasets:
- SUS for Commissioners
- Acute-Local Provider Flows
- Ambulance-Local Provider Flows
- Children and Young People Health
- Community-Local Provider Flows
- Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows
- Diagnostic Imaging Dataset
- Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows
- Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows
- Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Data Set
- Maternity Services Data Set
- Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set
- Mental Health Minimum Data Set
- Mental Health Services Data Set
- Mental Health-Local Provider Flows
- Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows
- Population Data-Local Provider Flows
- Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows
- Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows
Objectives:
Invoice Validation
Invoice validation is part of a process by which providers of care or services get paid for the work they do.
Invoices are submitted to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) so they are able to ensure that the activity claimed for each patient is their responsibility. This is done by processing and analysing Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, which is received into a secure Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF). The SUS+ data is identifiable at the level of NHS number. The NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets and will not be used further.
The legal basis for this to occur is under Section 251 of NHS Act 2006.
Invoice Validation with be conducted by North of England Commissioning Support Unit.
The CCG are advised by North of England Commissioning Support Unit whether payment for invoices can be made or not.
Risk Stratification
Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.
To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides a forecast of future demand by identifying high risk patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.
The legal basis for this to occur is under Section 251 of NHS Act 2006 (CAG 7-04(a)).
Risk Stratification will be conducted by eMBED Health Consortium
Yielded Benefits:
Expected Benefits:
Invoice Validation
1. Financial validation of activity
2. CCG Budget control
3. Commissioning and performance management
4. Meeting commissioning objectives without compromising patient confidentiality
5. The avoidance of misappropriation of public funds to ensure the ongoing delivery of patient care
Risk Stratification
Risk stratification promotes improved case management in primary care and will lead to the following benefits being realised:
1. Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these.
2. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency readmissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services thus allowing early intervention.
3. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required.
4. Supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework by allowing for more targeted intervention in primary care.
5. Better understanding of local population characteristics through analysis of their health and healthcare outcomes
All of the above lead to improved patient experience through more effective commissioning of services.
Outputs:
Invoice Validation
1. Addressing poor data quality issues
2. Production of reports for business intelligence
3. Budget reporting
4. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events
Risk Stratification
1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.
2. Output from the risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.
3. Record level output will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level.
4. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.
5. The CCG will be able to target specific patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions. The CCG will also be able to:
o Stratify populations based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost
o Plan work for commissioning services and contracts
o Set up capitated budgets
o Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.
Processing:
Data must only be used as stipulated within this Data Sharing Agreement.
Data Processors must only act upon specific instructions from the Data Controller.
Data can only be stored at the addresses listed under storage addresses.
The Data Controller and any Data Processor will only have access to records of patients of residence and registration within the CCG.
Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG unless it is for the purpose of Direct Care, where it may be shared only with those health professionals who have a legitimate relationship with the patient and a legitimate reason to access the data.
CCGs should work with general practices within their CCG to help them fulfil data controller responsibilities regarding flow of identifiable data into risk stratification tools.
No patient level data will be linked other than as specifically detailed within this agreement. Data will only be shared with those parties listed and will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement. The data to be released from NHS Digital will not be national data, but only that data relating to the specific locality of interest of the applicant.
The DSCRO (part of NHS Digital) will apply Type 2 objections before any identifiable data leaves the DSCRO.
NHS Digital reminds all organisations party to this agreement of the need to comply with the Data Sharing Framework Contract requirements, including those regarding the use (and purposes of that use) by “Personnel” (as defined within the Data Sharing Framework Contract ie: employees, agents and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that data)
Segregation
Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold both identifiable and pseudonymised data, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked.
All access to data is audited
Data for the purpose of Invoice Validation is kept within the CEfF, and only used by staff properly trained and authorised for the activity. Only CEfF staff are able to access data in the CEfF and only CEfF staff operate the invoice validation process within the CEfF. Data flows directly in to the CEfF from the DSCRO and from the providers – it does not flow through any other processors.
Invoice Validation
1. Identifiable SUS+ Data is obtained from the SUS+ Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO).
2. The DSCRO pushes a one-way data flow of SUS+ data into the Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) in the North of England Commissioning Support Unit.
3. The CSU carry out the following processing activities within the CEfF for invoice validation purposes:
a. Checking the individual is registered to a particular Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and associated with an invoice from the SUS data flow to validate the corresponding record in the backing data flow
b. Once the backing information is received, this will be checked against national NHS and local commissioning policies as well as being checked against system access and reports provided by NHS Digital to confirm the payments are:
i. In line with Payment by Results tariffs
ii. are in relation to a patient registered with a CCG GP or resident within the CCG area.
iii. The health care provided should be paid by the CCG in line with CCG guidance.
4. The CCG are notified that the invoice has been validated and can be paid. Any discrepancies or non-validated invoices are investigated and resolved between North of England Commissioning Support Unit CEfF team and the provider meaning that no identifiable data needs to be sent to the CCG. The CCG only receives notification to pay and management reporting detailing the total quantum of invoices received pending, processed etc.
Risk Stratification
1. Identifiable SUS+ data is obtained from the SUS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO).
2. Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the data identifiable at the level of NHS number is transferred securely to eMBED Health Consortium, who hold the SUS+ data within the secure Data Centre on N3.
3. Identifiable GP Data is securely sent from the GP system to eMBED Health Consortium.
4. SUS+ data is linked to GP data in the risk stratification tool by the data processor.
5. As part of the risk stratification processing activity, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool within the data processor, which highlights patients with whom the GP has a legitimate relationship and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.
6. Once eMBED Health Consortium has completed the processing, the CCG can access the online system via a secure connection to access the data pseudonymised at patient level.
Project 2 — NIC-59602-K3Y6W
Type of data: information not disclosed for TRE projects
Opt outs honoured: N
Legal basis: Health and Social Care Act 2012
Purposes: ()
Sensitive: Sensitive
When:2017.06 — 2017.05.
Access method: Ongoing
Data-controller type:
Sublicensing allowed:
Datasets:
- Local Provider Data - Acute
- Local Provider Data - Ambulance
- Local Provider Data - Community
- Local Provider Data - Emergency Care
- Local Provider Data - Public Health & Screening services
- Local Provider Data - Mental Health
- Local Provider Data - Other not elsewhere classified
- SUS Accident & Emergency data
- SUS Admitted Patient Care data
- SUS Outpatient data
- Local Provider Data - Demand for Service
- Local Provider Data - Diagnostic Services
- SUS (Accident & Emergency, Inpatient and Outpatient data)
- Local Provider Data - Acute, Ambulance, Community, Emergency Care, Mental Health, Other not elsewhere classified, Public Health & Screening services
Objectives:
New agreement for NHS Airedale Foundation Trust and their Vanguard partners, including the CCGs identified in this application to use pseudonymised data to provide Health and care tools that will support the Trust, their CCG partners, and Vanguard partners in improving integrated working and the delivery of integrated health and care in order to improve outcomes in ways such as those set out in the Better Care Fund (BCF) and to support the Vanguard integrated working.
The Vanguard Partnership is made of the following:
- Bradford City CCG
- Bradford Districts CCG
- Airedale, Wharfedale and Craven CCG
- East Lancashire CCG
- Yorkshire Ambulance Service
- North West Ambulance Service
- Airedale Hub
- East Lancashire Medical Services
The Airedale Partner’s Vanguard objective is to enhance the quality of life and end of life experience of thousands of nursing and care home residents living in Bradford, Airedale, Wharfedale, Craven and East Lancashire.
By using enabling technologies, such as telemedicine, the Gold Line and Intermediate Care Hub, nursing and care home residents and their carers are already benefitting from being able to access expert advice and support remotely 24/7.
Through the Vanguard programme, partners intend to go further and develop a more proactive health and social care enabling model focusing on optimising residents’ individual capabilities and building new clinical models of care. This model will be enabled through technology and an extended use of telemedicine, providing a single point of access to all aspects of specialist health and care advice.
The enhanced care model provides links to social care to complete a falls prevention assessment of the layout of the patient’s room, and a multidisciplinary team including carers, nurses, therapists, social care and the voluntary sector works in partnership to deliver care and support, promoting independence and improving quality of life.
The purpose of this DARS application is to support the commissioning activity of the four vanguard CCGs in relation to the Airedale Telemedicine Service as follows:
• Integrating care from secondary, primary and community services with independent sector residential and nursing home services including monitoring outcomes and experience.
• Informing the commissioning of the right services for care home residents which includes those in the same care home but who are registered with GPs who belong to different CCGs.
• Underpinning and informing service planning and monitoring on geographic bases requiring postcodes to understand the impact on specific homes whose residents have specific care needs.
• Targeting support for residents in specific care homes who are at high risk of becoming seriously ill requiring unplanned and emergency care requiring evidential data from several sources linked together.
• Ensuring appropriate clinical service delivery in care homes through evidential data indicating sufficient and appropriate utilisation of services.
Expected Benefits:
1) Supporting and improving outcomes of integrated workings and the delivery of health and care as set out in the Better Care Fund (BCF) and the Airedale and Partners Vanguard, including the aforementioned CCGs.
2) Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Develop business models.
c. Monitor In year projects.
3) Health economic modeling using
a. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
b. Analysis of outcome measures for different treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
c. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows
4) Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5) Enable monitoring of:
a. Trust and Vanguard outcome indicators.
b. Non – Financial validations of activity.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the Vanguard.
d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.
e. Case management.
f. Care service planning.
g. Commissioning and performance management.
6) Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers.
7) To support STP management information needs, particularly about service modelling, costs and impact of change
Outputs:
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
l. Reablement
m. Emergency admissions analysis
n. Reduction of stay and transfer of care delays
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. Identify base lines to measure future new services
9. Production of aggregate reports with small number suppression for Trust, Vanguard and other Health Business Intelligence
10. Production of project /programme level dashboards
11. Monitoring of Acute/Residential and other health quality matrix
12. Patient population profiling
Processing:
CCGs using North England CSU
1. North England Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtains a flow of identifiable SUS data for the CCG from the SUS Repository.
2. North England DSCRO also obtains identifiable local provider data for the CCG directly from Providers (as per Data Services for Commissioners Directions 2015).
3. Data quality management and pseudonymisation of data is completed by the DSCRO.
4. The DSCRO then securely transfers the following to North of England CSU:
a. The SUS data identifiable at the level of postcode.
b. The Local Provider data identifiable at the level of postcode.
5. North of England CSU land the data only. The CSU then securely pass the identifiable SUS data and the identifiable Local Flow data to PI Limited. The data will be destroyed by the CSU once this has occurred.
6. PI Limited link the data and produce online reports using the PI Limited data analysis tool.
7. The CCG is able to securely login via Role Based Access Controls to view Pseudonymised data for only those CCGs listed within the Data Sharing Agreement.
8. The Vanguard Evaluation Team is able to securely login via Role Based Access Controls to view identifiable data for only those CCGs listed within the Data Sharing Agreement.
9. Pseudonymised outputs is then passed from The Vanguard Evaluation Team to the CCGs. The Vanguard Evaluation Team also supply aggregate reports with small number suppression to members of the Vanguard Partnership.
10. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCGs and will only be shared within the CCGs on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. Access is limited to those administrative staff with authorised user accounts used for identification and authentication. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression in line with the HES analysis guide can be shared where contractual arrangements are in place.
Central Midlands DSCRO will apply Type 2 objections before any identifiable data leaves the DSCRO.
CCGs using Midlands and Lancashire CSU
1. Central Midlands Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtains a flow of identifiable SUS data for the CCG from the SUS Repository.
2. Central Midlands DSCRO also obtains identifiable local provider data for the CCG directly from Providers (as per Data Services for Commissioners Directions 2015).
3. Data quality management and pseudonymisation of data is completed by the DSCRO.
4. The DSCRO then securely transfers the following to Midlands and Lancashire CSU:
a. The SUS data identifiable at the level of postcode.
b. The Local Provider data identifiable at the level of postcode.
5. Midlands and Lancashire CSU land the data only. The CSU then securely pass the identifiable SUS data and the identifiable Local Flow data to PI Limited. The data will be destroyed by the CSU once this has occurred..
6. PI Limited link the data and produce online reports using the PI Limited data analysis tool.
7. The CCG is able to securely login via Role Based Access Controls to view Pseudonymised data for only those CCGs listed within the Data Sharing Agreement.
8. The Vanguard Evaluation Team is able to securely login via Role Based Access Controls to view identifiable data for only those CCGs listed within the Data Sharing Agreement.
9. Pseudonymised outputs is then passed from The Vanguard Evaluation Team to the CCGs. The Vanguard Evaluation Team also supply aggregate reports with small number suppression to members of the Vanguard Partnership.
10. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCGs and will only be shared within the CCGs on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. Access is limited to those administrative staff with authorised user accounts used for identification and authentication. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression in line with the HES analysis guide can be shared where contractual arrangements are in place.
Project 3 — NIC-90638-Q3T5B
Type of data: information not disclosed for TRE projects
Opt outs honoured: N, Y
Legal basis: Health and Social Care Act 2012, Section 251 approval is in place for the flow of identifiable data
Purposes: ()
Sensitive: Sensitive
When:2017.06 — 2017.05.
Access method: Ongoing
Data-controller type:
Sublicensing allowed:
Datasets:
- Children and Young People's Health Services Data Set
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Data Set
- Local Provider Data - Acute
- Local Provider Data - Ambulance
- Local Provider Data - Community
- Local Provider Data - Demand for Service
- Local Provider Data - Diagnostic Services
- Local Provider Data - Emergency Care
- Local Provider Data - Experience Quality and Outcomes
- Local Provider Data - Mental Health
- Local Provider Data - Other not elsewhere classified
- Local Provider Data - Population Data
- Local Provider Data - Primary Care
- Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set
- Mental Health Minimum Data Set
- Mental Health Services Data Set
- SUS Accident & Emergency data
- SUS Admitted Patient Care data
- SUS Outpatient data
- SUS data (Accident & Emergency, Admitted Patient Care & Outpatient)
- Maternity Services Dataset
- SUS for Commissioners
- Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows
- Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows
- Population Data-Local Provider Flows
- Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows
- Mental Health-Local Provider Flows
- Maternity Services Data Set
- Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows
- Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows
- Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows
- Diagnostic Imaging Dataset
- Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows
- Community-Local Provider Flows
- Children and Young People Health
- Ambulance-Local Provider Flows
- Acute-Local Provider Flows
Objectives:
Invoice Validation
As an approved Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF), the data processor receives SUS data identifiable at the level of NHS number according to S.251 CAG 7-07(a) and (c)/2013, to undertake invoice validation on behalf of the CCG. NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets and will not be shared outside of the CEfF. The CCG are advised by the CSU whether payment for invoices can be made or not.
Risk Stratification
To use SUS data identifiable at the level of NHS number according to S.251 CAG 7-04(a)/2013 (and Primary Care Data) for the purpose of Risk Stratification. Risk Stratification provides a forecast of future demand by identifying high risk patients. This enables commissioners to initiate proactive management plans for patients that are potentially high service users. Risk Stratification enables GPs to better target intervention in Primary Care.
Commissioning (Pseudonymised) – SUS and Local Flows
To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services. The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
Commissioning (Pseudonymised) – Mental Health, Maternity, IAPT, CYPHS and DIDS
To use pseudonymised data for the following datasets to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services :
- Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)
- Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)
- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)
- Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)
- Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)
- Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Expected Benefits:
Invoice Validation
1. Financial validation of activity
2. CCG Budget control
3. Commissioning and performance management
4. Meeting commissioning objectives without compromising patient confidentiality
5. The avoidance of misappropriation of public funds to ensure the ongoing delivery of patient care
Risk Stratification
Risk stratification promotes improved case management in primary care and will lead to the following benefits being realised:
1. Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these.
2. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency readmissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services and early intervention of appropriate care.
3. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required.
4. Potentially reduced premature mortality by more targeted intervention in primary care, which supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework.
5. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics.
All of the above lead to improved patient experience through more effective commissioning of services.
Commissioning (Pseudonymised) – SUS and Local Flows
1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, integrated care and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Develop business models.
c. Monitor In year projects.
2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.
3. Health economic modelling using:
a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets.
b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows.
4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5. Enables monitoring of:
a. CCG outcome indicators.
b. Non-financial validation of activity.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.
e. Case management.
f. Care service planning.
g. Commissioning and performance management.
h. List size verification by GP practices.
i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes.
j. Service Transformation Projects (STP)
6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers.
Further expected benefits include reduction in duplication, reduction in misinterpretation, less analytical resource on an already complex area and most importantly one version of the truth with a level of granularity that is important for these activities. The alternative of joining together aggregate reports to get a full picture in relation to a contract of STP boundary is inaccurate, prone to error and resource intensive.
Commissioning (Pseudonymised) – Mental Health, Maternity, IAPT, CYPHS and DIDS
1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, Integrated care and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Develop business models.
c. Monitor In year projects.
2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.
3. Health economic modelling using:
a. Analysis on provider performance against targets.
b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5. Enables monitoring of:
a. CCG outcome indicators.
b. Non-financial validation of activity.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.
e. Case management.
f. Care service planning.
g. Commissioning and performance management.
h. List size verification by GP practices.
i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes.
6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers.
Further expected benefits include reduction in duplication, reduction in misinterpretation, less analytical resource on an already complex area and most importantly one version of the truth with a level of granularity that is important for these activities. The alternative of joining together aggregate reports to get a full picture in relation to a contract of STP boundary is inaccurate, prone to error and resource intensive.
Outputs:
Invoice Validation
1. Addressing poor data quality issues
2. Production of reports for business intelligence
3. Budget reporting
4. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events
Risk Stratification
1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.
2. Output from the risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.
3. Record level output will be available for commissioners pseudonymised at patient level and aggregate with small number suppression.
4. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.
Commissioning (Pseudonymised) – SUS and Local Flows
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals POD.
e. Planned care by POD view – activity, finance plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include frequent flyers.
9. Mortality
10. Quality
11. Service utilisation reporting
12. Patient safety indicators
13. Production of reports and dash boards to support service redesign and pathway changes
Further expected outputs as a result of sharing data include provider level contract monitoring for activity and finance reports, whole system analysis and monitoring as a result of collaborative commissioning and contracting. Opportunity identification, baselining, analysis and monitoring related to STP plans and delivery interventions would also need to be completed based on a collaborative footprint and therefore shared data repositories are fundamental to this.
Commissioning (Pseudonymised) – Mental Health, Maternity, IAPT, CYPHS and DIDS
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include frequent flyers.
Further expected outputs as a result of sharing data include provider level contract monitoring for activity and finance reports, whole system analysis and monitoring as a result of collaborative commissioning and contracting. Opportunity identification, baselining, analysis and monitoring related to STP plans and delivery interventions would also need to be completed based on a collaborative footprint and therefore shared data repositories are fundamental to this.
Processing:
Invoice Validation (Data Processor 1- North of England CSU)
SUS Data is obtained from the SUS Repository to DSCRO.
1. DSCRO pushes a one-way data flow of SUS data into the Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) in the North of England CSU.
2. The CSU carry out the following processing activities within the CEfF for invoice validation purposes:
a. Checking the individual is registered to a particular Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and associated with an invoice from the national SUS data flow to validate the corresponding record in the backing data flow
b. Once the backing information is received, this will be checked against national NHS and local commissioning policies as well as being checked against system access and reports provided by NHS Digital to confirm the payments are:
i. In line with Payment by Results tariffs
ii. are in relation to a patient registered with a CCG GP or resident within the CCG area.
iii. The health care provided should be paid by the CCG in line with CCG guidance.
3. The CCG are notified that the invoice has been validated and can be paid. Any discrepancies or non-validated invoices are investigated and resolved between the CSU CEfF team and the provider meaning that no identifiable data needs to be sent to the CCG. The CCG only receives notification to pay and management reporting detailing the total quantum of invoices received pending, processed etc.
Risk Stratification (Data Processor 2- eMBED)
Identifiable SUS data is obtained from the SUS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO).
1. Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the data identifiable at the level of NHS number is transferred securely to eMBED, who hold the SUS data within eMBED secure storage.
2. Identifiable GP Data is securely sent from the GP system to eMBED.
3. SUS data is linked to GP data in the risk stratification tool by the data processor.
4. As part of the risk stratification processing activity, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool within the data processor, which highlights patients with whom the GP has a legitimate relationship and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier derived from SUS available to GPs is the NHS number of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients is derived from the GP data sourced from their own systems.
5. eMBED who hosts the risk stratification system that holds SUS data is limited to those administrative staff with authorised user accounts used for identification and authentication.
6. Once eMBED has completed the processing, the CCG can access the online system via a secure network connection to access the data pseudonymised at patient level.
Commissioning (Pseudonymised) – SUS and Local Flows
1. Yorkshire Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office / North England Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtains a flow of SUS identifiable data for the CCG from the SUS Repository. Yorkshire / North of England DSCRO also obtains identifiable local provider data for the CCG directly from Providers.
2. Data quality management and pseudonymisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the pseudonymised data is then passed securely to North of England CSU for the addition of derived fields and analysis.
3. North of England CSU then pass the processed, pseudonymised data to both eMBED and the CCG.
4. eMBED receives the Pseudonymised data for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data sets and analysis. Linked data is limited to the following to give a rich and broad clinical journey allowing improved care planning, patient care and commissioning:
- SUS data and Local Provider data at pseudonymised level
- Mental Health (MHSDS, MHLDDS, MHMDS) with SUS
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) with SUS
- Diagnostic Imaging Dataset (DIDs) with SUS
- Maternity (MSDS) with SUS
- Children and Young People’s Health Services (CYPHS) with Local provider data
- Mental Health (MHSDS, MHLDDS, MHMDS) with Local provider data
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) with Local provider data
- Diagnostic Imaging Dataset (DIDs) with Local provider data
- Maternity (MSDS) with Local provider data
- Children and Young People’s Health Services (CYPHS) with Local provider data
5. eMBED securely transfer pseudonymised outputs for management use by the CCG.
6. The CCG receive Pseudonymised data from both North of England CSU and eMBED. The CCG then analyse the data to see patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning.
7. Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by the North of England CSU, eMBED or the CCG as instructed by the CCG.
8. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the three CCGs named within the agreement and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement unless otherwise specified within Annex C of this agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression.
9. The CCG securely transfer data back to the provider to:
a) confirm how patients are reported in SUS, and how the commissioner can reliably group these patients into categories for points of delivery;
b) allow for granular data validation whereby a commissioner may query the SUS record, and need to pass it back to the provider for checking; and
c) to allow the provider to undertake further analysis of a cohort of their patients as requested and specified by the commissioner.
The data transferred to the provider is only that which relates directly to the data previously uploaded by that particular provider. No data sourced from another provider will be shared.
Commissioning (Pseudonymised) – Mental Health, MSDS, IAPT, CYPHS and DIDS
1. North of England Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) and Yorkshire Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtain a flow of data identifiable at the level of NHS number for Mental Health (MHSDS, MHMDS and MHLDDS), Maternity (MSDS), Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT), Child and Young People’s Health (CYPHS) and Diagnostic Imaging (DIDS) for commissioning purposes.
2. Data quality management, minimisation and pseudonymisation of data is completed by North of England and DSCRO and the pseudonymised data is then passed securely to North of England CSU.
3. North of England CSU then securely transfers the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to eMBED and the CCG.
4. a) The CCG analyses the data to see patient journeys for pathway or service design, re-design and de-commissioning.
b) eMBED receives the data from North of England CSU and carries out further data processing, addition of derived fields, linkage to other data sets and analysis. Linked data includes the following to give a rich and broad clinical journey allowing improved care planning, patient care and commissioning:
- Mental Health (MHSDS, MHLDDS, MHMDS) with IAPT
- Mental Health (MHSDS, MHLDDS, MHMDS) with SUS
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) with SUS
- Diagnostic Imaging Dataset (DIDs) with SUS
- Maternity (MSDS) with SUS
- Children and Young People’s Health Services (CYPHS) with SUS
5. Aggregation of required data for CCG management use is completed by the CSU or the CCG as instructed by the CCG.
6. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the three CCGs named within the agreement and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement unless otherwise specified within Annex C of this agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression.
Project 4 — NIC-21930-V7V8D
Type of data: information not disclosed for TRE projects
Opt outs honoured: N
Legal basis: Health and Social Care Act 2012
Purposes: ()
Sensitive: Sensitive
When:2016.12 — 2017.02.
Access method: Ongoing
Data-controller type:
Sublicensing allowed:
Datasets:
- Mental Health Minimum Data Set
- Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set
- Mental Health Services Data Set
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Data Set
- Children and Young People's Health Services Data Set
Objectives:
To use pseudonymised data for the following datasets to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:
• Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)
• Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)
• Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)
• Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)
• Children and Young People’s Health (CYPHS)
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Expected Benefits:
1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, Integrated Care and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Development of business models.
c. Monitoring In year projects.
2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.
3. Health economic modelling using:
a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets.
b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC).
4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5. Enables monitoring of:
a. CCG outcome indicators.
b. Non-financial validation of activity.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.
e. Case management.
f. Care service planning.
g. Commissioning and performance management.
h. List size verification by GP practices.
Outputs:
As a result of the aforementioned processing activities, eMBED will provide a number of outputs which are securely provided to the CCGs in the appropriate format at pseudonymised level.
Where datasets have been linked, the CCG will receive the outputs of analysis instead of the direct data, however it may also be necessary to provide linked data at row level to CCGs (pseudonymised record level data).
eMBED will provide aggregated reports only with small number suppression to CCG’s stakeholders e.g. GP practices, Local Authorities. Where such data is provided there are safeguards in place to ensure that the receiving organisation has recognised the required safety controls required, i.e. signed agreements from the receiving organisation regarding compliance with data protection and the agreed use of the data.
eMBED will flow outputs, mostly in the form of reports to the CCG stakeholders. CCGs may also provide their stakeholders with the anonymised outputs. The anonymisation will be achieved by aggregating records and using small number suppression in line with HES analysis guidance.
eMBED provides a range of Business Intelligence functions and outputs as specified by the CCG. These outputs can be presented in a variety of different ways to a variety of different users, from highly aggregated graphical “dashboards” to very low-level tabular analysis, and everything in between with the opportunity to drill-down into the detail. Provision of aggregated reports only with small number suppression data to CCG stakeholders allows for analysis at an appropriate level, revealing potentially useful but previously unrecognised commissioning insights/trends whilst mitigating against the risk of re-identification of individuals
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports including high flyers.
The PCU produces a number of reports which provide a summary (not patient level data) which are shared back to the CCG, the following are a list of these:
IAPT Dataset
Mandated national contract KPIs:
Completion of IAPT Minimum Data Set outcome data
IAPT Access Times – 6 & 18 wk (finished treatment)
Local CCG and NHSE information and KPIs:
Number of Referrals
Number Entering Treatment
Monthly Prevalence rate
Number completing treatment
Number moving to recovery
Number not at caseness
Monthly Recovery rate
Reliable Improvement rate
IAPT Access Times – 6 & 18 wk (entering treatment)
Waiting times for treatment and those still waiting
Clearance times
Local CCG monitoring:
Appointments, cancellations and DNA rate analysis
Data Quality
Referral rates and activity by GP Practice and Age band
Mental Health Dataset
Mandated national contract KPIs :
Completion of valid NHS number field
Completion of Ethnic coding
Under 16 bed days on Adult wards (Never event)
Local CCG and NHSE information and KPIs:
Gatekeeping admissions
7 day follow-up hospital discharges
EIP access rates
Eating disorders
Local CCG monitoring:
Referral rates by GP Practice and Age band
CPA monitoring inc settled accommodation and employment
CPA reviews within 12 months, step up/down etc
Bed days, admissions and discharges
Delayed discharges
Detentions
LD/ MH/CAMHS ward stays
Bed locality (distance out of area)
Contacts and DNA rates
Cluster monitoring and red rules
Data quality
The PCU will also share aggregated reports only with small number suppression back to the provider.
The PCU shares aggregated reports only with small number suppression outputs with NHS England for national reporting and to support any issues that need rising in relation to data quality.
Processing:
1. North of England Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) and Yorkshire Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtain a flow of data identifiable at the level of NHS number for Mental Health (MHSDS, MHMDS and MHLDDS), Maternity (MSDS), Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT), Child and Young People’s Health (CYPHS) and Diagnostic Imaging (DIDS) for commissioning purposes.
2. Data quality management, minimisation and pseudonymisation of data is completed by North of England and Yorkshire DSCRO and the pseudonymised data is then passed securely to North of England CSU.
3. North of England CSU then securely transfers the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to eMBED and the CCG.
4. a) The CCG analyses the data to see patient journeys for pathway or service design, re-design and de-commissioning.
b) eMBED receives the data from North of England CSU and carries out further data processing, addition of derived fields, linkage to other data sets and analysis. Linked data includes the following to give a rich and broad clinical journey allowing improved care planning, patient care and commissioning:
• Mental Health (MHSDS, MHLDDS, MHMDS) with IAPT
• Mental Health (MHSDS, MHLDDS, MHMDS) with SUS
• Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) with SUS
• Diagnostic Imaging Dataset (DIDs) with SUS
• Maternity (MSDS) with SUS
• Children and Young People’s Health Services (CYPHS) with SUS
5. Aggregation of required data for CCG management use is completed by the CSU or the CCG as instructed by the CCG.
6. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression in line with the HES analysis guide can be shared.
Project 5 — NIC-60452-X5V8S
Type of data: information not disclosed for TRE projects
Opt outs honoured: N
Legal basis: Health and Social Care Act 2012
Purposes: ()
Sensitive: Sensitive
When:2016.12 — 2017.02.
Access method: Ongoing
Data-controller type:
Sublicensing allowed:
Datasets:
- SUS (Accident & Emergency, Inpatient and Outpatient data)
- Local Provider Data - Acute, Ambulance, Community, Demand for Service, Diagnostic Services, Emergency Care, Experience Quality and Outcomes, Mental Health, Other not elsewhere classified, Population Data, Primary Care
Objectives:
SUS and Local Provider Data - The CCG recognises that good information and intelligence is crucial for the commissioning of high quality and safe services leading to better outcomes for the populations they serve. This application supports this objective.
This arrangement was previously agreed to facilitate the transfer of Commissioning Support Services, from Yorkshire & Humber Commissioning Support Unit (Y&H CSU), who previously held ASH status and served the CCGs, to North England CSU (NECS), and eMBED Health Consortium, for ongoing provision in line with the NHS England Lead Provider Framework (LPF).
Data Processor 1 - NECS is a commissioning support unit that had been working with the CCG for some time.
Data Processor 2 - eMBED was appointed in March 2016 to continue the operations of the Yorkshire and Humber CSU; Kier Business Services Limited, with additional Business Intelligence work carried out under contract by Dr Foster Ltd.
Kier Business Services are the prime partner for the LPF within the eMBED Health Consortium. Both organisations (Kier Business Services and Dr Foster Ltd) are a legal entity in their own right. Dr Foster Ltd are subcontracted to Kier Business Services for the delivery of eMBED Health Consortium services.
Expected Benefits:
1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, integrated care and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Develop business models.
c. Monitor In year projects.
2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.
3. Health economic modelling using:
a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets.
b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC).
4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5. Enables monitoring of:
a. CCG outcome indicators.
b. Non-financial validation of activity.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.
e. Case management.
f. Care service planning.
g. Commissioning and performance management.
h. List size verification by GP practices.
i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes.
6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers.
Outputs:
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.
9. Monitoring of hospital activity against planned levels where an established contract exists between a provider and a commissioner inclusive of:
o Overall contract reporting of actual vs plan for activity and value at aggregate level
o Reconciliation reports between local hospital data, and SUS records at aggregate level.
o Contract Data Quality reporting at anonymised in context record level.
10. QIPP scheme analysis at aggregate level
11. Monitoring of SUS based CCG Outcome Framework indicators at aggregate level with small number suppression.
12. “Deep dive” analysis of hospital activity at aggregate level.
13. Cross CCG benchmarking at aggregate level.
14. Provision of aggregate reports with small number suppression activity data to CCGs’ stakeholders e.g. Health and Wellbeing Boards where the CCG have agreed to this
Processing:
1. Yorkshire Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office / North England Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtains a flow of SUS identifiable data for the CCG from the SUS Repository. Yorkshire / North England DSCRO also obtains identifiable local provider data for the CCG directly from Providers.
2. Data quality management and pseudonymisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the pseudonymised data is then passed securely to North of England CSU for the addition of derived fields and analysis.
3. North of England CSU then pass the processed, pseudonymised data to both eMBED and the CCG.
4. eMBED receives the Pseudonymised data for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data sets and analysis. Linked data is limited to the following to give a rich and broad clinical journey allowing improved care planning, patient care and commissioning:
- SUS data and Local Provider data at pseudonymised level
- Mental Health (MHSDS, MHLDDS, MHMDS) with SUS
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) with SUS
- Diagnostic Imaging Dataset (DIDs) with SUS
- Maternity (MSDS) with SUS
- Children and Young People’s Health Services (CYPHS) with Local provider data
- Mental Health (MHSDS, MHLDDS, MHMDS) with Local provider data
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) with Local provider data
- Diagnostic Imaging Dataset (DIDs) with Local provider data
- Maternity (MSDS) with Local provider data
- Children and Young People’s Health Services (CYPHS) with Local provider data
5. eMBED securely transfer pseudonymised outputs for management use by the CCG.
6. The CCG receive Pseudonymised data from both North of England CSU and eMBED. The CCG then analyse the data to see patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning.
7. Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by the CSU, eMBED or the CCG as instructed by the CCG.
8. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression in line with the HES analysis guide can be shared where contractual arrangements are in place.
9. The CCG securely transfer Pseudonymised data back to the provider to:
a) confirm how patients are reported in SUS, and how the commissioner can reliably group these patients into categories for points of delivery;
b) allow for granular data validation whereby a commissioner may query the SUS record, and need to pass it back to the provider for checking; and
c) to allow the provider to undertake further analysis of a cohort of their patients as requested and specified by the commissioner.
The data transferred to the provider is only that which relates directly to the data previously uploaded by that particular provider.
Project 6 — NIC-56511-W5S6S
Type of data: information not disclosed for TRE projects
Opt outs honoured: Y
Legal basis: Section 251 approval is in place for the flow of identifiable data
Purposes: ()
Sensitive: Sensitive
When:2016.12 — 2017.02.
Access method: Ongoing
Data-controller type:
Sublicensing allowed:
Datasets:
- SUS (Accident & Emergency, Inpatient and Outpatient data)
Objectives:
As an approved Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF), the data processor receives SUS data identifiable at the level of NHS number according to S.251 CAG 7-07(a) and (c)/2013, to undertake invoice validation on behalf of the CCG. NHS number is only used to confirm the accuracy of backing-data sets and will not be shared outside of the CEfF. The CCG are advised by the CSU whether payment for invoices can be made or not.
No record level data will be linked other than as specifically detailed within this application/agreement. Data will only be shared with those parties listed and will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement. The data to be released from the NHS Digital will not be national data, but only that data relating to the specific locality of interest of the applicant.
Expected Benefits:
1. Financial validation of activity
2. CCG Budget control
3. Commissioning and performance management
4. Meeting commissioning objectives without compromising patient confidentiality
5. The avoidance of misappropriation of public funds to ensure the ongoing delivery of patient care
Outputs:
1. Addressing poor data quality issues
2. Production of reports for business intelligence
3. Budget reporting
4. Validation of invoices for non-contracted events
Processing:
North of England DSCRO (part of NHS Digital) will apply Type 2 objections (from 14th October 2016 onwards) before any identifiable data leaves the DSCRO.
1. SUS Data is obtained from the SUS Repository to North of England DSCRO.
2. North of England DSCRO pushes a one-way data flow of SUS data into the Controlled Environment for Finance (CEfF) in the North of England CSU.
3. The CSU carry out the following processing activities within the CEfF for invoice validation purposes:
a. Checking the individual is registered to a particular Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and associated with an invoice from the national SUS data flow to validate the corresponding record in the backing data flow
b. Once the backing information is received, this will be checked against national NHS and local commissioning policies as well as being checked against system access and reports provided by NHS Digital to confirm the payments are:
i. In line with Payment by Results tariffs
ii. are in relation to a patient registered with a CCG GP or resident within the CCG area.
iii. The health care provided should be paid by the CCG in line with CCG guidance.
4. The CCG are notified that the invoice has been validated and can be paid. Any discrepancies or non-validated invoices are investigated and resolved between the CSU CEfF team and the provider meaning that no identifiable data needs to be sent to the CCG. The CCG only receives notification to pay and management reporting detailing the total quantum of invoices received pending, processed etc.
Project 7 — NIC-22509-N5Y6X
Type of data: information not disclosed for TRE projects
Opt outs honoured: Y
Legal basis: Section 251 approval is in place for the flow of identifiable data
Purposes: ()
Sensitive: Sensitive
When:2016.12 — 2017.02.
Access method: Ongoing
Data-controller type:
Sublicensing allowed:
Datasets:
- SUS (Accident & Emergency, Inpatient and Outpatient data)
Objectives:
To utilise SUS data Identifiable at the level of NHS number to provide risk stratification information to the GP practice.
Expected Benefits:
To provide risk profiling, calculated on activity data from secondary and primary care. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, the GP have access to the eMBED CPM web-tool for reports which presents to them their registered patients and associated risk score.
The GP can access the eMBED CPM web-tool which is a secure portal at any time which will support multi-disciplinary team discussions around ongoing patient care, enhanced service requirements and supporting patient care.
The GP can copy and paste the NHS number presented in the eMBED CPM web-tool to any other program including the practice clinical system, in order to perform the key aspects of this risk stratification role.
There are two outputs available in the eMBED CPM web-tool, these are:
• Identifiable Reports – containing a record for each patient with NHS number, name and unique identifier Patient ID which is added to each record during data processing.
Non-Identifiable Reports – NHS number and name are removed but the record still contains the unique identifier patient ID. The GP practice authorises the access to the eMBED CPM web-tool, the level of access and which view is available.
Aggregated outputs are available to the CCG on request via eMBED.
No data will be shared with any other third party organisations.
Outputs:
To provide risk profiling, calculated on activity data from secondary and primary care. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, the GP have access to the eMBED CPM web-tool for reports which presents to them their registered patients and associated risk score.
The GP can access the eMBED CPM web-tool which is a secure portal at any time which will support multi-disciplinary team discussions around ongoing patient care, enhanced service requirements and supporting patient care.
The GP can copy and paste the NHS number presented in the eMBED CPM web-tool to any other program including the practice clinical system, in order to perform the key aspects of this risk stratification role.
There are two outputs available in the eMBED CPM web-tool, these are:
• Identifiable Reports – containing a record for each patient with NHS number, name and unique identifier Patient ID which is added to each record during data processing.
Non-Identifiable Reports – NHS number and name are removed but the record still contains the unique identifier patient ID. The GP practice authorises the access to the eMBED CPM web-tool, the level of access and which view is available.
Aggregated outputs are available to the CCG on request via eMBED.
No data will be shared with any other third party organisations.
Processing:
Processing of SUS Data for the purposes of Risk Stratification includes landing, processing, staging and publication.
1. Landing
Prior to the release of SUS data by DSCRO Yorkshire, Type 2 objections will be applied and the relevant patients data redacted. DSCRO Yorkshire securely transfer the SUS data identifiable at the level of NHS number. Data is landed and processed in an access restricted data centre located at eMBED.
Only named individuals have access to process the data. All users undertake regular IG training, in line with IGT & ISO 27001:2013 requirements.
2. Processing
Data is processed on a monthly basis.
2.1. Data is extracted from primary care systems and downloaded to a secure storage area within eMBED, it is then processed to exclude data for patient objections and sensitive conditions
2.2. Cleaning and quality checks are carried out and documented.
2.3. SUS and primary care data are linked.
2.4. Creation of Risk Stratification dataset.
2.5. Risk Stratification dataset processed through CPM Risk Stratification Algorithm to produce a Risk Stratified scoring dataset.
3. Staging
Data is landed to a secure staging area for final quality checks before forwarding to the live server.
4. Publication
Outputs are available to GP practice for their own patients only via the eMBED CPM web-portal. Access to the eMBED CPM web-portal is via username and password. All usage of its tools is audited this is controlled by the practices.
There are two outputs available, these are:
• Identifiable Reports – containing a record for each patient with NHS number, name and unique identifier Patient ID which is added to each record during data processing.
• Non-Identifiable Reports – NHS number and name are removed but the record still contains the unique identifier patient ID. (The Patient ID is generated during the loading and processing and are used in referencing the different tables so no one knows these numbers.)
Data identifiable at the level of NHS number is only available to named individuals within the GP Practices who have a legitimate relationship with the patient.
The web-portal is accessed by the GP using a username and password.
The GP have direct access to any underlying patient level SUS data where they can see all aspects of the inpatient and outpatient activity.
The GP also has access to the diagnosis data from both SUS data and the primary care data.