NHS Digital Data Release Register - reformatted

NHS Manchester CCG projects

New application to link SUS data to GP and Social Care Data
DSFC - NHS Manchester CCG Commissioning, Risk Strat
Project 3
Project 4
Project 5
Project 6

1081 data files in total were disseminated unsafely (information about files used safely is missing for TRE/"system access" projects).

🚩 NHS Manchester CCG was sent multiple files from the same dataset, in the same month, both with optouts respected and with optouts ignored. NHS Manchester CCG may not have compared the two files, but the identifiers are consistent between datasets, and outside of a good TRE NHS Digital can not know what recipients actually do.

New application to link SUS data to GP and Social Care Data — DARS-NIC-272984-V0C5X

Type of data: information not disclosed for TRE projects

Opt outs honoured: No - data flow is not identifiable, Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant (Does not include the flow of confidential data)

Legal basis: Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(1) and s261(2)(b)(ii), Health and Social Care Act 2012 s261(1) and s261(2)(b)(ii), Health and Social Care Act 2012 s261(2)(b)(ii)

Purposes: No (Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG), Sub ICB Location)

Sensitive: Sensitive

When:DSA runs 2019-03-01 — 2022-02-28 2019.04 — 2021.05.

Access method: Frequent Adhoc Flow, One-Off

Data-controller type: NHS MANCHESTER CCG, NHS GREATER MANCHESTER ICB - 14L

Sublicensing allowed: No

Datasets:

SUS for Commissioners

Objectives:

Commissioning

To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.

The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.

The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:
- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)

The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:
 Population health management:
• Understanding the interdependency of care services
• Targeting care more effectively
• Using value as the redesign principle
 Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
 Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them
 Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs
 Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated
 Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another
 Service redesign
 Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population
 Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to identify specific patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models

NHS Manchester CCG needs access to pseudonymised datasets that can be linked together to enable the commissioning of high quality and effective services that meet the needs of the population it serves.

The linked datasets will provide a holistic view of the need and utilisation of services, where gaps exist and will support the following commissioning activities:

Assessing need and demand for services
• Population segmentation and profiling
• Epidemiology
• Risk Stratification and predictive modelling to identify patients most at risk
Review of Services and their interdependencies
• Service utilisation
• Capacity and gap analysis
• Cost benefit analysis
• Cost effectiveness analysis
Risk Management
• Identification of key health and healthcare risks
• Financial control: risks identified and managed
• Delivery of national and local targets
Priority Setting
• Target health and care priorities more effectively
• Resource allocation and budget setting
• Activity and financial modelling
Shaping Supply
• Service re-design
Contract Implementation and monitoring
• Activity and financial plan setting
• Contract KPIs setting
• Contract and budget monitoring
• Outcomes monitoring
• Service evaluation
• Data Quality checking and improvement plans

The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by Manchester CCG.

Expected Benefits:

Commissioning
1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, integrated care and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Develop business models.
c. Monitor In year projects.
2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.
3. Health economic modelling using:
a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets.
b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC).
4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5. Enables monitoring of:
a. CCG outcome indicators.
b. Financial and Non-financial validation of activity.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.
e. Case management.
f. Care service planning.
g. Commissioning and performance management.
h. List size verification by GP practices.
i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes.
6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers.
7. Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these.
8. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency readmissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services and early intervention of appropriate care.
9. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required.
10. Potentially reduced premature mortality by more targeted intervention in primary care, which supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework.
11. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics.
12. Better understanding of contract requirements, contract execution, and required services for management of existing contracts, and to assist with identification and planning of future contracts
13. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities.
14. Providing greater understanding of the underlying courses and look to commission improved supportive networks, this would be ongoing work which would be continually assessed.
15. Insight to understand the numerous factors that play a role in the outcome for both datasets. The linkage will allow the reporting both prior to, during and after the activity, to provide greater assurance on predictive outcomes and delivery of best practice.
16. Provision of indicators of health problems, and patterns of risk within the commissioning region.
17. Support of benchmarking for evaluating progress in future years.

Outputs:

Commissioning
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.
9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports
10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
11. Contract Management and Modelling
12. Patient Stratification, such as:
o Patients at highest risk of admission
o Most expensive patients (top 15%)
o Frail and elderly
o Patients that are currently in hospital
o Patients with most referrals to secondary care
o Patients with most emergency activity
o Patients with most expensive prescriptions
o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another
i. Discharged from hospital
ii. Discharged from community
13. Validation for payment approval, ability to validate that claims are not being made after an individual has died, like Oxygen services.
14. Validation of programs implemented to improve patient pathway e.g. High users unable to validate if the process to help patients find the best support are working or did the patient die.
15. Clinical - understand reasons why patients are dying, what additional support services can be put in to support.
16. Understanding where patient are dying e.g. are patients dying at hospitals due to hospices closing due to Local authorities withdrawing support, or is there a problem at a particular trust.
17. Removal of patients from Risk Stratification reports.
18. Re births provide a one stop shop of information, Births are recorded in multiple sources covering hospital and home births, a chance to overlook activity.

Processing:

Data must only be used for the purposes stipulated within this Data Sharing Agreement. Any additional disclosure / publication will require further approval from NHS Digital.

Data Processors must only act upon specific instructions from the Data Controller.

Data can only be stored at the addresses listed under storage addresses.

All access to data is managed under Role-Based Access Controls. Users can only access data authorised by their role.

Patient level data will not be linked other than as specifically detailed within this Data Sharing Agreement. Data released will only be shared with those parties listed and will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement. The data to be released from NHS Digital will not be national data.

NHS Digital reminds all organisations party to this agreement of the need to comply with the Data Sharing Framework Contract requirements, including those regarding the use (and purposes of that use) by “Personnel” (as defined within the Data Sharing Framework Contract ie: employees, agents and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that data)

Onward Sharing

Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG unless it is for the purpose of Direct Care, where it may be shared only with those health professionals who have a legitimate relationship with the patient and a legitimate reason to access the data.

Aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared externally as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.

Segregation

Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold both identifiable and pseudonymised data, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked.

All access to data is auditable by NHS Digital.

Data Minimisation
Data Minimisation in relation to the data sets listed within the application are listed below. This also includes the purpose on which they would be applied -

For the purpose of Commissioning:
• Patients who are normally registered and/or resident within the Manchester CCG (including historical activity where the patient was previously registered or resident in another commissioner).
and/or
• Patients treated by a provider where Manchester CCG is the host/co-ordinating commissioner and/or has the primary responsibility for the provider services in the local health economy – this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows.
and/or
• Activity identified by the provider and recorded as such within national systems (such as SUS+) as for the attention of Manchester CCG - this is only for commissioning and relates to both national and local flows.

Local Identifiers:
If a Data Controller organisation (or the Data Processor working on their behalf):
a. only receives a DSCRO disseminated identifiable (NHS Number) flow, then it can receive clear local identifiers.
b. receives and pseudonymised flow, then clear local identifiers can be included and used only for the purpose outlined within the Data Sharing Agreement
c. receives both DSCRO disseminated identifiable and pseudonymised flows, the identifiable flow must have the local identifiers pseudonymised or removed.

NHS Ilkeston Community Hospital do not access data held under this agreement as they only supply the building. Therefore, any access to the data held under this agreement would be considered a breach of the agreement. This includes granting of access to the database[s] containing the data.

The Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtains the following data sets:
1. SUS+
Data quality management and pseudonymisation is completed within the DSCRO using the open pseudonymiser tool and is then disseminated as follows:
1. Pseudonymised SUS+ only is securely transferred from the DSCRO to Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit.
2. Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit add derived fields and link data
3. Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit securely pass the pseudonymised SUS data to NHS Manchester CCG.
4. Identifiable GP data is securely extracted from the GP systems by NHS Manchester CCG, which acts as a data processor on behalf of the GP practice. The data is pseudonymised by NHS Manchester CCG (acting on behalf of the GP practices) in a controlled area on the network by individuals who don’t then have access to the pseudonymised data for analysis. This is done using an open pseudonymisation tool and an ‘Encryption Key’ which is specific to the project, provided by the DSCRO.
5. The pseudonymised GP data is transferred from the controlled area within NHS Manchester CCG to a separate server where the data can be linked by the CCG’s commissioning analysts in a controlled environment by named members of staff.
6. Manchester City Council pseudonymise social care data at source using the open pseudonymisation tool and an ‘Encryption Key’ which is specific to the project, provided by the DSCRO.
7. Manchester City Council transfer the pseudonymised data to NHS Manchester CCG.
8. NHS Manchester CCG provide analysis to:
a. See patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning.
b. Check recorded activity against contracts or invoices and facilitate discussions with providers.
c. Undertake population health management
d. Undertake data quality and validation checks
e. Thoroughly investigate the needs of the population
f. Understand cohorts of residents who are at risk
g. Conduct Health Needs Assessments
9. Allowed linkage is between the data sets contained within points 1, 5 and 7.
10. Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by NHS Manchester CCG.
11. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.

Aggregate reports with small number suppression commissioning intelligence will be available to a range of partner organisations. The data will be used to understand patient journeys for pathway and service re-design. Access to commissioning intelligence is governed by respective organisation employee code of practice, data protection policies and information governance protocols.

The open pseudonymisation key cannot be used to re-identify data as it only allows for one-way pseudonymisation.

DSFC - NHS Manchester CCG Commissioning, Risk Strat — DARS-NIC-47190-V7H9B

Type of data: information not disclosed for TRE projects

Opt outs honoured: No - data flow is not identifiable, Yes - patient objections upheld, Anonymised - ICO Code Compliant, Identifiable (Section 251, Section 251 NHS Act 2006)

Legal basis: Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(1) and s261(2)(b)(ii), Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(7), Health and Social Care Act 2012 s261(1) and s261(2)(b)(ii), Health and Social Care Act 2012 s261(7), Health and Social Care Act 2012 s261(2)(b)(ii)

Purposes: No (Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG), Sub ICB Location)

Sensitive: Sensitive

When:DSA runs 2019-02-01 — 2022-01-31 2018.06 — 2021.05.

Access method: Frequent adhoc flow, Frequent Adhoc Flow, One-Off

Data-controller type: NHS MANCHESTER CCG, NHS GREATER MANCHESTER ICB - 14L

Sublicensing allowed: No

Datasets:

Acute-Local Provider Flows
Adult Social Care
Ambulance-Local Provider Flows
Children and Young People Health
Community Services Data Set
Community-Local Provider Flows
Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows
Diagnostic Imaging Dataset
Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows
Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows
Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Data Set
Maternity Services Data Set
Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set
Mental Health Minimum Data Set
Mental Health Services Data Set
Mental Health-Local Provider Flows
National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (CWT)
Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows
Population Data-Local Provider Flows
Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows
Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows
SUS for Commissioners
Civil Registration - Births
Civil Registration - Deaths
National Cancer Waiting Times Monitoring DataSet (NCWTMDS)
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Data Set_v1.5
Civil Registrations of Death
Community Services Data Set (CSDS)
Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DID)
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) v1.5
Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set (MHLDDS)
Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)
Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)

Objectives:

Risk Stratification
Risk stratification is a tool for identifying and predicting which patients are at high risk or are likely to be at high risk and prioritising the management of their care in order to prevent worse outcomes.
To conduct risk stratification Secondary User Services (SUS+) data, identifiable at the level of NHS number is linked with Primary Care data (from GPs) and an algorithm is applied to produce risk scores. Risk Stratification provides focus for future demands by enabling commissioners to prepare plans for patients. Commissioners can then prepare plans for patients who may require high levels of care. Risk Stratification also enables General Practitioners (GPs) to better target intervention in Primary Care.
The legal basis for this to occur is under Section 251 of NHS Act 2006 (CAG 7-04(a)).
Risk Stratification will be conducted by Arden and GEM CSU

Commissioning
To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:
- Secondary Uses Service (SUS+)
- Local Provider Flows
o Acute
o Ambulance
o Community
o Demand for Service
o Diagnostic Service
o Emergency Care
o Experience, Quality and Outcomes
o Mental Health
o Other Not Elsewhere Classified
o Population Data
o Primary Care Services
o Public Health Screening
- Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)
- Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)
- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)
- Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)
- Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)
- Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)
- Community Services Data Set (CSDS)
- National Cancer Waiting Times (CWT)
- Adult Social Care

The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:
§ Population health management:
• Understanding the interdependency of care services
• Targeting care more effectively
• Using value as the redesign principle
§ Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
§ Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them
§ Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs
§ Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated
§ Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another
§ Service redesign
§ Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population
§ Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to identify specific patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models

The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by:
Data Processor 1 – Arden and GEM CSU conduct Risk Stratification as instructed by the CCG. The CSU also processes SUS, Local Provider flows, mental health, IAPT, MSDS, CYPHS, CSDS, CWT, Adult Social Care and DIDS for the purpose of commissioning.

Data Processor 2 - Greater Manchester Shared Services (GMSS) have taken BI services in house and are now hosted by Oldham CCG. AGEM CSU flow data to a small team within GMSS. Access to the data is restricted to this team who access and manage the data. These BI services were previously provided by North West CSU.

GMSS deliver a range of services including;
effective use of resources;
data quality;
information governance;
market management;
provider contract & performance management;

To enable GMSS to support these services a team within the GMSS have controlled access to SUS data at a pseudonymised level. Access to the data is controlled by AGEM CSU using users’ roles to ensure only appropriate users gain access to pseudonymised data. Data can then be used for reporting to support the range of services being offered to CCGs, and CCGs receive aggregate level reports from GMSS. GMSS staff are separate from Oldham CCG staff and accordingly have separate functions and roles.

Data Processor 3 - Advancing Quality Alliance (AQuA) provide support for a range of quality improvement programmes including the NW Advancing Quality Programme. They will identify cohorts of patients within specific disease groups for further analysis to help drive quality improvements across the region.

Data Processor 4 - The Academic Health Sciences Network (Utilisation Management Team) receive Pseudonymised SUS data for Greater Manchester patients. They analyse the data to look at processes rather than patients, for example, A&E performance, process times, bed days as well as ‘deep dives’ to support clinical reviews for CCGs.

Advancing Quality Alliance (AQuA) and the Academic Health Science Network are hosted by Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust who are the legal entity for both.

Yielded Benefits:

N/A

Expected Benefits:

Risk Stratification
Risk stratification promotes improved case management in primary care and will lead to the following benefits being realised:
1. Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these.
2. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency readmissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services thus allowing early intervention.
3. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required.
4. Supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework by allowing for more targeted intervention in primary care.
5. Better understanding of local population characteristics through analysis of their health and healthcare outcomes
All of the above lead to improved patient experience through more effective commissioning of services.

Commissioning
1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, integrated care and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Develop business models.
c. Monitor In year projects.
2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.
3. Health economic modelling using:
a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets.
b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC).
4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5. Enables monitoring of:
a. CCG outcome indicators.
b. Financial and Non-financial validation of activity.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.
e. Case management.
f. Care service planning.
g. Commissioning and performance management.
h. List size verification by GP practices.
i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes.
6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers.
7. Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these.
8. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency readmissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services and early intervention of appropriate care.
9. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required.
10. Potentially reduced premature mortality by more targeted intervention in primary care, which supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework.
11. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics.
12. Better understanding of contract requirements, contract execution, and required services for management of existing contracts, and to assist with identification and planning of future contracts
13. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities.

Outputs:

Risk Stratification
1. As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.
2. Output from the risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.
3. Record level output will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level.
4. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS+ data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient.
5. The CCG will be able to target specific patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions. The CCG will also be able to:
o Stratify populations based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost
o Plan work for commissioning services and contracts
o Set up capitated budgets
o Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes.

Commissioning
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.
9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports
10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
11. Contract Management and Modelling
12. Patient Stratification, such as:
o Patients at highest risk of admission
o Most expensive patients (top 15%)
o Frail and elderly
o Patients that are currently in hospital
o Patients with most referrals to secondary care
o Patients with most emergency activity
o Patients with most expensive prescriptions
o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another
i. Discharged from hospital
ii. Discharged from community

Processing:

Data must only be used as stipulated within this Data Sharing Agreement.

Data Processors must only act upon specific instructions from the Data Controller.

Data can only be stored at the addresses listed under storage addresses.

The Data Controller and any Data Processor will only have access to records of patients of residence and registration within the CCG.

Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG unless it is for the purpose of Direct Care, where it may be shared only with those health professionals who have a legitimate relationship with the patient and a legitimate reason to access the data.

All access to data is managed under Roles-Based Access Controls

No patient level data will be linked other than as specifically detailed within this agreement. Data will only be shared with those parties listed and will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement. The data to be released from NHS Digital will not be national data, but only that data relating to the specific locality and that data required by the applicant.

NHS Digital reminds all organisations party to this agreement of the need to comply with the Data Sharing Framework Contract requirements, including those regarding the use (and purposes of that use) by “Personnel” (as defined within the Data Sharing Framework Contract ie: employees, agents and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that data)

The DSCRO (part of NHS Digital) will apply Type 2 objections before any identifiable data leaves the DSCRO.

CCGs should work with general practices within their CCG to help them fulfil data controller responsibilities regarding flow of identifiable data into risk stratification tools.

Segregation
Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold both identifiable and pseudonymised data, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked.

All access to data is auditable by NHS Digital.

Risk Stratification
1. Identifiable SUS+ data is obtained from the SUS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO).
2. Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the data identifiable at the level of NHS number is transferred securely to Arden and GEM CSU, who hold the SUS+ data within the secure Data Centre on N3.
3. Identifiable GP Data is securely sent from the GP system to Arden and GEM CSU.
4. SUS+ data is linked to GP data in the risk stratification tool by the data processor.
5. As part of the risk stratification processing activity, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool within the data processor, which highlights patients with whom the GP has a legitimate relationship and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems.
6. Once Arden and GEM CSU has completed the processing, the CCG can access the online system via a secure connection to access the data pseudonymised at patient level.

Commissioning
The Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtains the following data sets:
1. SUS+
2. Local Provider Flows (received directly from providers)
a. Acute
b. Ambulance
c. Community
d. Demand for Service
e. Diagnostic Service
f. Emergency Care
g. Experience, Quality and Outcomes
h. Mental Health
i. Other Not Elsewhere Classified
j. Population Data
k. Primary Care Services
l. Public Health Screening
3. Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)
4. Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)
5. Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)
6. Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)
7. Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)
8. Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)
9. Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)
10 Community Services Data Set (CSDS)
11. National Cancer Waiting Times (CWT)
12. Adult Social Care
Data quality management and pseudonymisation is completed within the DSCRO and is then disseminated as follows:

Data Processor 1 – Arden and GEM CSU
1. Pseudonymised SUS+, Local Provider data, Mental Health data (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS), Maternity data (MSDS), Improving Access to Psychological Therapies data (IAPT), Child and Young People’s Health data (CYPHS), Community Services Data Set (CSDS), National Cancer Waiting Times (CWT), Adult Social Care and Diagnostic Imaging data (DIDS) only is securely transferred from the DSCRO to Arden and GEM CSU.
2. Arden and GEM CSU add derived fields, link data and provide analysis to:
a. See patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning.
b. Check recorded activity against contracts or invoices and facilitate discussions with providers.
c. Undertake population health management
d. Undertake data quality and validation checks
e. Thoroughly investigate the needs of the population
f. Understand cohorts of residents who are at risk
g. Conduct Health Needs Assessments
3. Allowed linkage is between the data sets contained within point 1.
4. Arden and GEM CSU then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG.
5. Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by Arden and GEM CSU or the CCG as instructed by the CCG.
6. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared as set out within NHS Digital guidance applicable to each data set.

Data Processor 2 – Greater Manchester Shared Services (GMSS) (via DP1):
1. Pseudonymised SUS, Local Provider data, Mental Health data (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS), Maternity data (MSDS) and Improving Access to Psychological Therapies data (IAPT) only is securely transferred from the DSCRO to Arden and GEM CSU.
2. Arden and GEM CSU add derived fields, link data and provide analysis.
3. Allowed linkage is between the data sets contained within point 1.
4. Arden and GEM CSU then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the Greater Manchester Shared Services (GMSS) hosted by NHS Oldham CCG.
GMSS analyse the data to see patient journeys for pathway or service design, re-design and de-commissioning.
5. GMSS then pass the processed pseudonymised data to the CCG
6. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared.

Data Processor 3 – Advancing Quality Alliance (AQuA) (via DP1):
1. Pseudonymised SUS, Local Provider data and Mental Health data (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS) only is securely transferred from the DSCRO to Arden and GEM CSU.
Arden and GEM CSU add derived fields, link data and provide analysis.
2. Allowed linkage is between the data sets contained within point 1.
3. Arden and GEM CSU then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to Advancing Quality Alliance (AQuA) to provide support for a range of quality improvement programmes including the NW Advancing Quality Programme. AQuA identifies cohorts of patients within specific disease groups for further analysis to help drive quality improvements across the region.
4. AQuA produces aggregate reports only with small number suppression. Only aggregate reports are sent to the CCG.

Data Processor 4 – Academic Health Sciences Network (Utilisation Management Team) (SUS Only) (via DP1):
1. Pseudonymised SUS data only is securely transferred from the DSCRO to Arden and GEM CSU.
2. Arden and GEM CSU add derived fields, link data and provide analysis.
3. Allowed linkage is between the data sets contained within point 1.
Arden and GEM CSU then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the Academic Health Service (Utilisation Management Team) (AHSN UMT)
4. The AHSN UMT receive pseudonymised SUS data for Greater Manchester patients. They analyse the data to look at processes rather than patients, for example, A&E performance, process times, bed days as well as ‘deep dives’ to support clinical reviews for CCGs.
5. AHSN UMT produces aggregate reports only with small number suppression. Only aggregate reports are sent to the CCG

Project 3 — DARS-NIC-139079-M6P7X

Type of data: information not disclosed for TRE projects

Opt outs honoured: No - data flow is not identifiable

Legal basis: Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(1) and s261(2)(b)(ii)

Purposes: ()

Sensitive: Sensitive

When:2018.10 — 2019.04.

Access method: Frequent Adhoc Flow

Data-controller type:

Sublicensing allowed:

Datasets:

Acute-Local Provider Flows
Adult Social Care
Ambulance-Local Provider Flows
Children and Young People Health
Community-Local Provider Flows
Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows
Diagnostic Imaging Dataset
Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows
Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows
Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Data Set
Maternity Services Data Set
Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set
Mental Health Minimum Data Set
Mental Health Services Data Set
Mental Health-Local Provider Flows
Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows
Population Data-Local Provider Flows
Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows
Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows
SUS for Commissioners

Objectives:

Commissioning
To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support the commissioning of health services. The data (containing both clinical and financial information) is analysed so that health care provision can be planned to support the needs of the population within the CCG area.
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:
- Secondary Uses Service (SUS)
- Local Provider Flows
o Acute
o Ambulance
o Community
o Demand for Service
o Diagnostic Service
o Emergency Care
o Experience, Quality and Outcomes
o Mental Health
o Other Not Elsewhere Classified
o Population Data
o Primary Care Services
o Public Health Screening
- Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)
- Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)
- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)
- Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)
- Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)
- Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)
- Adult Social Care
The pseudonymised data is required to for the following purposes:
- Population health management:
- Understanding the interdependency of care services
- Targeting care more effectively
- Using value as the redesign principle
- Ensuring we do what we should
- Data Quality and Validation – allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
- Thoroughly investigating the needs of the population, to ensure the right services are available for individuals when and where they need them
- Understanding cohorts of residents who are at risk of becoming users of some of the more expensive services, to better understand and manage those needs
- Monitoring population health and care interactions to understand where people may slip through the net, or where the provision of care may be being duplicated
- Modelling activity across all data sets to understand how services interact with each other, and to understand how changes in one service may affect flows through another
- Service redesign
- Health Needs Assessment – identification of underlying disease prevalence within the local population
- Patient stratification and predictive modelling - to identify specific patients at risk of requiring hospital admission and other avoidable factors such as risk of falls, computed using algorithms executed against linked de-identified data, and identification of future service delivery models
- Monitoring, at a population level, particular cohorts of service users and designing analytical models which support more effective interventions in health and Adult Social Care
- Monitoring service and integrated care outcomes across a pathway or care setting involving Adult Social Care
- Developing, through evaluation, more effective interventions across a pathway or care setting involving Adult Social Care
- Designing and implementing new payment models across health and Adult Social Care
- Understanding current and future population needs and resource utilisation for local strategic planning purposes.
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Processing for commissioning will be conducted by Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit.

Expected Benefits:

Commissioning
1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, integrated care and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Develop business models.
c. Monitor In year projects.
2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.
3. Health economic modelling using:
a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets.
b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC).
4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5. Enables monitoring of:
a. CCG outcome indicators.
b. Financial and Non-financial validation of activity.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.
e. Case management.
f. Care service planning.
g. Commissioning and performance management.
h. List size verification by GP practices.
i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes.
j. Understanding delayed discharges to reduce hospital length of stay
6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers.
7. Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these.
8. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency readmissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services and early intervention of appropriate care.
9. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required.
10. Potentially reduced premature mortality by more targeted intervention in primary care, which supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework.
11. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics.
12. Better understanding of contract requirements, contract execution, and required services for management of existing contracts, and to assist with identification and planning of future contracts
13. Insights into patient outcomes, and identification of the possible efficacy of outcomes-based contracting opportunities.

Outputs:

Commissioning
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.
9. Comparators of CCG performance with similar CCGs as set out by a specific range of care quality and performance measures detailed activity and cost reports
10. Data Quality and Validation measures allowing data quality checks on the submitted data
11. Contract Management and Modelling
12. Patient Stratification, such as:
o Patients at highest risk of admission
o Most expensive patients (top 15%)
o Frail and elderly
o Patients that are currently in hospital
o Patients with most referrals to secondary care
o Patients with most emergency activity
o Patients with most expensive prescriptions
o Patients recently moving from one care setting to another
i. Discharged from hospital
ii. Discharged from community
13. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence including:-
a. Understanding current and future population needs and resource utilisation
b. Tracking outcomes across pathways, and meeting outcome targets
c. Evaluation of interventions across pathways
d. Designing and implementing new payment models
e. More sophisticated risk stratification and predictive analytics
f. Demand management
14. Production of project / programme level dashboards

Processing:

Data must only be used as stipulated within this Data Sharing Agreement.

Data Processors must only act upon specific instructions from the Data Controller.

Data can only be stored at the addresses listed under storage addresses.

The Data Controller and any Data Processor will only have access to records of patients of residence and registration within the CCG.

Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG unless it is for the purpose of Direct Care, where it may be shared only with those health professionals who have a legitimate relationship with the patient and a legitimate reason to access the data.

No patient level data will be linked other than as specifically detailed within this agreement. Data will only be shared with those parties listed and will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement. The data to be released from NHS Digital will not be national data, but only that data relating to the specific locality of interest of the applicant.
NHS Digital reminds all organisations party to this agreement of the need to comply with the Data Sharing Framework Contract requirements, including those regarding the use (and purposes of that use) by “Personnel” (as defined within the Data Sharing Framework Contract ie: employees, agents and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that data)

Segregation
Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold both identifiable and pseudonymised data, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked.
All access to data is audited

Commissioning
The Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtains the following data sets:
1. SUS
2. Local Provider Flows (received directly from providers)
o Acute
o Ambulance
o Community
o Demand for Service
o Diagnostic Service
o Emergency Care
o Experience, Quality and Outcomes
o Mental Health
o Other Not Elsewhere Classified
o Population Data
o Primary Care Services
o Public Health Screening
3. Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)
4. Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)
5. Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)
6. Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)
7. Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)
8. Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)
9. Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)
10. Adult Social Care
Data quality management and pseudonymisation is completed within the DSCRO and is then disseminated as follows:
Data Processor 1 – Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit
1) Pseudonymised SUS, Local Provider data, Mental Health data (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS), Maternity data (MSDS), Improving Access to Psychological Therapies data (IAPT), Child and Young People’s Health data (CYPHS), Diagnostic Imaging data (DIDS) and Adult Social Care data only is securely transferred from the DSCRO to Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit.
2) Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit add derived fields, link data and provide analysis to:
o See patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning.
o Check recorded activity against contracts or invoices and facilitate discussions with providers.
o Undertake population health management
o Undertake data quality and validation checks
o Thoroughly investigate the needs of the population
o Understand cohorts of residents who are at risk
o Conduct Health Needs Assessments
3) Allowed linkage is between the data sets contained within point 1.
4) Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the CCG.
5) Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit or the CCG as instructed by the CCG.
6) Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared.

Project 4 — DARS-NIC-122737-X2Y7F

Type of data: information not disclosed for TRE projects

Opt outs honoured: No - data flow is not identifiable, Yes - patient objections upheld (Section 251)

Legal basis: Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(1) and s261(2)(b)(ii), National Health Service Act 2006 - s251 - 'Control of patient information'.

Purposes: ()

Sensitive: Sensitive

When:2018.10 — 2019.04.

Access method: Frequent Adhoc Flow

Data-controller type:

Sublicensing allowed:

Datasets:

Acute-Local Provider Flows
Ambulance-Local Provider Flows
Children and Young People Health
Community Services Data Set
Community-Local Provider Flows
Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows
Diagnostic Imaging Dataset
Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows
Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows
Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Data Set
Maternity Services Data Set
Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set
Mental Health Minimum Data Set
Mental Health Services Data Set
Mental Health-Local Provider Flows
Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows
Population Data-Local Provider Flows
Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows
Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows
SUS for Commissioners

Objectives:

Risk Stratification
To use SUS data identifiable at the level of NHS number according to S.251 CAG 7-04(a) (and Primary Care Data) for the purpose of Risk Stratification. Risk Stratification provides a forecast of future demand by identifying high risk patients. This enables commissioners to initiate proactive management plans for patients that are potentially high service users. Risk Stratification enables GPs to better target intervention in Primary Care

Pseudonymised – SUS and Local Flows
To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services. The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.

Pseudonymised – Mental Health, Maternity, IAPT, CYPHS and DIDS
To use pseudonymised data for the following datasets to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services :
- Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)
- Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)
- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)
- Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)
- Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)
- Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
Pseudonymised linked data sets including Primary Care, Secondary Care (SUS) and Adult Social Care
To link pseudonymised datasets to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services, a linked data set is needed to gain a holistic understanding of all the care that the Manchester population is currently receiving and the interactions that individuals have with different parts of the system.
The linked data sets will support Manchester Health and Care Commissioning (MHCC) in designing and delivering a more joined up, more efficient and higher quality care service in the future and is a key enabler of the MHCC priority of improving population outcomes by delivering person-centred care in the most appropriate way. A linked data set will enable the MHCC partner organisations to better identify, support and treat people in an integrated health and care system.

No record level data will be linked other than as specifically detailed within this application/agreement. Data will only be shared with those parties listed and will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement. The data to be released from the HSCIC will not be national data, but only that data relating to the specific locality of interest of the applicant.

Expected Benefits:

Risk Stratification
Risk stratification promotes improved case management in primary care and will lead to the following benefits being realised:
1. Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these.
2. Numbers of high risk patients with care plans.
3. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency readmissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services and early intervention of appropriate care.
4. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required.
5. Potentially reduced premature mortality by more targeted intervention in primary care, which supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework.
6. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics.
All of the above lead to improved patient experience through more effective commissioning of services.

Pseudonymised – SUS and Local Flows
1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, Integrated care and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Develop business models.
c. Monitor in-year projects.
2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.
3. Health economic modelling using:
a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets.
b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC).
4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5. Enables monitoring of:
a. CCG outcome indicators.
b. Non-financial validation of activity.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.
e. Case management.
f. Care service planning.
g. Commissioning and performance management.
h. List size verification by GP practices.
i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes.
6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level.
7. A whole system approach including:
a. Deeper integration
b. Needs based pathway models
c. Pooled budgets
d. Community-based recovery-focussed models of support
e. Greater integration across mental and physical health and social care services
f. Integration with Local Care Organisations – promoting early identification and prevention of mental health patients
g. Develop a consistent set of shared minimum standards and outcomes.
h. Improve information sharing between agencies to facilitate collaboration and drive integrated care, through integrated patient records and/or patient ownership of information.

Pseudonymised – Mental Health, Maternity, IAPT, CYPHS and DIDS
1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, Integrated care and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Develop business models.
c. Monitor In year projects.
2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.
3. Health economic modelling using:
a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets.
b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC).
4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5. Enables monitoring of:
a. CCG outcome indicators.
b. Non-financial validation of activity.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.
e. Case management.
f. Care service planning.
g. Commissioning and performance management.
h. List size verification by GP practices.
i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes.
6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level.
Pseudonymised linked data sets including Primary Care, Secondary Care (SUS) and Adult Social Care
1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to gain a holistic view of demand, integrated care and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Develop business models.
c. Monitor in-year projects.
2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.
3. Health economic modelling using:
a. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions and population cohorts, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
b. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
c. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC).
4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5. Enables monitoring of:
a. Health and Social Care Outcome indicators.
b. Holistic analysis of service utilisation.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within MHCC
d. Case management.
e. Care service planning.
f. Commissioning and performance management.
g. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes.
6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level.
7. A whole system approach including:
a. Deeper integration
b. Needs based pathway models
c. Pooled budgets
d. Community-based recovery-focussed models of support
e. Greater integration across mental and physical health and social care services
f. Integration with Local Care Organisations – promoting early identification and prevention of mental health patients
g. Develop a consistent set of shared minimum standards and outcomes.
h. Improve information sharing between agencies to facilitate collaboration and drive integrated care, through integrated patient records and/or patient ownership of information.

Outputs:

Risk Stratification
1. 1) As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The risk stratification presents pseudonymised data to the GPs. GPs are able to re-identify information only for their own patients for the purpose of direct care.
2. Output from the risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.
3. Record level output will be available for commissioners pseudonymised at patient level and aggregated reports.
Pseudonymised – SUS and Local Flows
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.

Pseudonymised – Mental Health, Maternity, IAPT, CYPHS and DIDS
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.

Pseudonymised linked data sets including Primary Care, Secondary Care (SUS) and Adult Social Care
A critical enabler to deliver the MHCC vision of an integrated care system is the ability to link data from across the health and care systems to gain a much better understanding of the care that the Manchester population is currently receiving and the interactions that individuals have with different parts of the system. The outputs will include:
1. Health needs assessments
2. Health Equity Audits
3. Neighbourhood and population cohort profiles
4. Holistic evaluation of health and social care commissioning initiatives
5. Cost Benefit Analysis

Processing:

Prior to the release of identifiable data by North West DSCRO, Type 2 objections will be applied and the relevant patient’s data redacted.
Risk Stratification
1. SUS Data is sent from the SUS Repository to North West Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) to the data processor.
2. SUS data identifiable at the level of NHS number regarding hospital admissions, A&E attendances and outpatient attendances is delivered securely from North West DSCRO to the data processor.
3. Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by North West DSCRO and the data identifiable at the level of NHS number is transferred securely to Arden & GEM CSU, who hold the SUS data within the secure Data Centre on N3.
4. Identifiable GP Data is securely sent from the GP system to Arden & GEM CSU.
5. SUS data is linked to GP data in the risk stratification tool by the data processor.
6. Arden & GEM CSU who hosts the risk stratification system that holds SUS data is limited to those administrative staff with authorised user accounts used for identification and authentication.
7. Once Arden & GEM CSU has completed the processing, the data is passed to the CCG in pseudonymised form at patient level and as aggregated reports.

Data Processor 6
1. SUS Data is sent from the SUS Repository to North West Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) to DSCRO North.
2. SUS data identifiable at the level of NHS number regarding hospital admissions, A&E attendances and outpatient attendances is delivered securely from DSCRO North to the data processor following the upholding of patient objections
3. Identifiable GP Data is securely sent from the GP system to the data processor.
4. SUS data is linked to GP data in the risk stratification tool by the data processor.
5. North of England CSU (NECS) who hosts the risk stratification system that holds SUS data is limited to those administrative staff with authorised user accounts used for identification and authentication.
6. Once NECS has completed the processing, the data is made available to the CCG in pseudonymised form at patient level and as aggregated reports.
7. GPs have access to the risk stratification tool within the data processor, which highlights patients with whom the GP has a legitimate relationship and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier derived from SUS available to GPs is the NHS number of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients is derived from the GP data sourced from their own systems.

Pseudonymised – SUS and Local Flows
Data Processor 2 – GMSS
1. North West Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) receives a flow of SUS identifiable data for the CCG from the SUS Repository.
2. Data quality management and pseudonymisation of data is completed by North West DSCRO and the pseudonymised data is then passed securely to Arden & GEM CSU for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data sets and analysis.
3. Arden & GEM CSU then passes the pseudonymised data securely to the Greater Manchester Shared Services (GMSS).
4. GMSS analyse the data to see patient journeys for pathway or service design, re-design and de-commissioning.
5. GMSS then pass the processed pseudonymised data to the CCG.
6. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression in line with the HES analysis guide.
Data Processor 4 - AQuA
1. North West Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) receives a flow of SUS identifiable data for the CCG from the SUS Repository. North West DSCRO also receives identifiable local provider data for the CCG directly from Providers.
2. Data quality management and pseudonymisation of data is completed by North West DSCRO and the pseudonymised data is then passed securely to Arden & GEM CSU for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data sets and analysis.
3. Arden & GEM CSU then passes the pseudonymised data securely to AQuA to provide support for a range of quality improvement programmes including the NW Advancing Quality Programme. AQuA identifies cohorts of patients within specific disease groups for further analysis to help drive quality improvements across the region.
4. AQuA produces aggregate reports only with small number suppression in line with the HES analysis guide. Only aggregate reports are sent to the CCG.
Data Processor 5 – Academic Health Sciences Network (Utilisation Management Team) (SUS Only):
1. North West Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) receives a flow of SUS identifiable data for the CCG from the SUS Repository.
2. Data quality management and pseudonymisation of data is completed by North West DSCRO and the pseudonymised data is then passed securely to Arden & GEM CSU for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data and analysis.
3. Arden & GEM CSU then passes the pseudonymised data securely to the Academic Health Service (Utilisation Management Team) (AHSN UMT)
4. The AHSN UMT receive pseudonymised SUS data for Greater Manchester patients. They analyse the data to look at processes rather than patients, for example, A&E performance, process times, bed days as well as ‘deep dives’ to support clinical reviews for CCGs.
5. AHSN UMT produces aggregate reports only with small number suppression in line with the HES analysis guide. Only aggregate reports are sent to the CCG.
Data Processor 6 – North of England CSU
1. North West Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) receives a flow of SUS identifiable data for the CCG from the SUS Repository. North West DSCRO also receives identifiable local provider data for the CCG directly from Providers.
2. Data quality management completed by North West DSCRO with the NHS Number data passed securely to DSCRO North
3. DSCRO North pseudonymise the data and pass securely to North of England CSU (NECS) for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data sets and analysis.
4. NECS provide access to the data for the CCG via an online platform (RAIDR). Access to RAIDR is secured via rolled based access controls.
5. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG

Pseudonymised linked data set, Primary Care, SUS and Adult Social care:
1. North West Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) receives a flow of SUS identifiable data for the CCG from the SUS Repository.
2. Data quality management and pseudonymisation of data is completed by North West DSCRO and the pseudonymised data is then passed securely to Arden & GEM CSU for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data sets and analysis.
3. The SUS data is pseudonymised by DSCRO using an ‘Encryption Key’ that is specific to the Manchester Health Care Commissioning (MHCC).
4. Arden & GEM CSU the passes the pseudonymised SUS data securely to the CCG.
5. Data quality management of Adult Social Care data is completed by Manchester City Council. The Social Care data is pseudonymised at source using the MHCC specific ‘Encryption Key’, provided by North West DSCRO. This consistently pseudonymised data is securely passed to the CCG using the MHCC shared area of the local secure network.
6. Identifiable GP Data is securely sent from the GP systems to Manchester CCG’s Data Warehouse Administrator, which acts as data processor on behalf of the GP practices.
7. MCCG Data Warehouse Administrator processes the data to meet the requirements specified by MHCC.
8. The data is pseudonymised by MCCG Data Warehouse Administrator (acting on behalf of the GP practices) using the ‘Encryption Key’ which is specific to the MHCC project, provided by North West DSCRO.
9. The pseudonymised primary care data is then passed securely in a consistently pseudonymised form at patient level to the CCG’s Commissioning analysts.

The CCG will undertake linkage of the pseudonymised data sets, using the consistent pseudonym to make the link. This will be done within a controlled environment by named members of staff. The CCG will make available on-line reports to provide high level intelligence, based on a holistic view of care across the Manchester Health and Care System.
Access to commissioning intelligence at pseudonymised record level will be available to a small team of named members of staff in the Council and the CCG. Aggregate commissioning intelligence will be available to a range of MHCC staff and partner organisations. The data will be used to understand patient journeys for pathway and service re-design.
Access to commissioning intelligence is governed by respective organisation employee code of practice, data protection policies and information governance protocols. Additionally, access to the record level data will conform to a specific information access agreement which governs how the data will be handled and used. The pseudonymised data provided to Manchester City Council will be stored separately to the original identifiable data and managed by a different team. The Council will not attempt to combine these data sets or re-identify the data.
Manchester CCG will be responsible for linking the data but will not have access to the pseudonymisation tool, which allows data to be pseudonymised using the Encryption key. The Encryption key will only be shared by the DSCRO with named individuals in the MHCC partner organisations, who will have documented responsibility to use the key to ensure that the agreed data for linkage is pseudonymised. These individuals are contractually bound to adhere to organisational policies and procedures for safe management of the data.
The key cannot be used to re-identify data as it only allows for one-way pseudonymisation.

NHS Bury CCG, NHS Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale CCG, NHS Manchester CCG and NHS Oldham CCG have a collaborative information sharing agreement in place to share pseudonymised SLAM and SLAM Backup data between these CCGs only. SLAM data is included under Local Flows and is available under the Health and Social Care Act 2012.

Pseudonymised – Mental Health and IAPT
Data Processor 2 – GMSS (via DP1):
1. North West Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) receives a flow of data identifiable at the level of NHS number for Mental Health (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS) North West DSCRO also receive a flow of pseudonymised patient level data for each CCG for Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) for commissioning purposes
2. The pseudonymised data is securely transferred from North West DSCRO to Arden & GEM CSU for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data sets and analysis.
3. Arden & GEM CSU then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the Greater Manchester Shared Services (GMSS)
4. GMSS analyse and conduct the BI function and then send the Pseudonymised data to the CCG.
5. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression in line with the HES analysis guide.
Data Processor 4 - Advancing Quality Alliance (AQuA)
1. North West Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) receives a flow of data identifiable at the level of NHS number for Mental Health (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS).
2. Data quality management and pseudonymisation of data is completed by North West DSCRO and the pseudonymised data is then passed securely to Arden & GEM CSU for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data sets and analysis.
3. Arden & GEM CSU then passes the pseudonymised data securely to Advancing Quality Alliance (AQuA).
4. AQuA receives pseudonymised SUS data for Greater Manchester patients. They analyse the data to look at processes rather than patients, for example, A&E performance, process times, bed days as well as ‘deep dives’ to support clinical reviews for CCGs.
5. AQuA produces aggregate reports only with small number suppression in line with the HES analysis guide. Only aggregate reports are sent to the CCG.

Project 5 — DARS-NIC-120770-V1H9H

Type of data: information not disclosed for TRE projects

Opt outs honoured: N (Section 251)

Legal basis: Health and Social Care Act 2012 – s261(1) and s261(2)(b)(ii)

Purposes: ()

Sensitive: Sensitive

When:2018.06 — 2018.09.

Access method: Frequent adhoc flow

Data-controller type:

Sublicensing allowed:

Datasets:

Acute-Local Provider Flows
Ambulance-Local Provider Flows
Community-Local Provider Flows
Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows
Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows

Objectives:

Commissioning
To use pseudonymised data which will be shared between multiple CCGs which will be listed within the Data Sharing Agreement, to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services. The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.
The following pseudonymised datasets are required to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services:
- Local Provider Flows
o Acute
o Ambulance
o Community
o Diagnostic Service
o Emergency Care
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.

The following CCGs are able to share record level data between the CCGs to enable collaborative reporting by their respective CCG analysts and Data Processor Analysts (Arden and GEM CSU):
- NHS Bury CCG
- NHS Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale CCG
- NHS Manchester CCG
- NHS Oldham CCG
The CCGs work together on a collaborative basis across to support each other in delivering their commissioning agendas. For example, they wish to carry out contract monitoring, e.g. SUS SLAM reconciliation, for all the four CCGs listed above where they are lead commissioner; or where a CCG provides a contract monitoring service for another CCG. The CCGs request approval (through this DARS amendment) to share the following datasets on a collaborative basis across the four CCGs , to be used for collaborative reporting in any combination of CCGs in the group, or at individual CCG level reporting as required; both by a CCG’s in house BI/Contract Analysts and by their Data Processor Analysts, Arden and GEM CSU:
• Local Provider Flows (for commissioning)

The CCGs may access the pseudonymised data of each CCG for the purpose of commissioning only. The data listed in Annex A of the DSA is the data that the CCGs will be allowed to access.

Expected Benefits:

Commissioning
1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, integrated care and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Develop business models.
c. Monitor In year projects.
2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.
3. Health economic modelling using:
a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets.
b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC).
4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5. Enables monitoring of:
a. CCG outcome indicators.
b. Non-financial validation of activity.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.
e. Case management.
f. Care service planning.
g. Commissioning and performance management.
h. List size verification by GP practices.
i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes.
6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers.

Outputs:

Commissioning
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.

Processing:

Data must only be used as stipulated within this Data Sharing Agreement.

Data Processors must only act upon specific instructions from the Data Controller.

Data can only be stored at the addresses listed under storage addresses.

The Data Controller and any Data Processor will only have access to records of patients of residence and registration within the CCG.

Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG unless otherwise stipulated within this agreement or it is for the purpose of Direct Care, where it may be shared only with those health professionals who have a legitimate relationship with the patient and a legitimate reason to access the data.

No patient level data will be linked other than as specifically detailed within this agreement. Data will only be shared with those parties listed and will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement. The data to be released from NHS Digital will not be national data, but only that data relating to the specific locality of interest of the applicant.
NHS Digital reminds all organisations party to this agreement of the need to comply with the Data Sharing Framework Contract requirements, including those regarding the use (and purposes of that use) by “Personnel” (as defined within the Data Sharing Framework Contract ie: employees, agents and contractors of the Data Recipient who may have access to that data)

Segregation
Where the Data Processor and/or the Data Controller hold both identifiable and pseudonymised data, the data will be held separately so data cannot be linked.
All access to data is audited

Commissioning
The Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtains the following data sets:
1. Local Provider Flows (received directly from providers)
o Acute
o Ambulance
o Community
o Diagnostic Service
o Emergency Care
Data quality management and pseudonymisation is completed within the DSCRO and is then disseminated as follows:
Data Processor 1 – Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit
1) Pseudonymised Local Provider data only are securely transferred from the DSCRO to Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit.
2) Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit add derived fields, link data and provide analysis.
3) Allowed linkage is between the data sets contained within point 1.
4) Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to each CCG. The CCG analyse the data to see patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning.
5) Aggregation of required data for CCG management use will be completed by Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit or the CCG as instructed by the CCG.
6) Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared.

Project 6 — NIC-47190-V7H9B

Type of data: information not disclosed for TRE projects

Opt outs honoured: N, Y

Legal basis: Health and Social Care Act 2012, Section 251 approval is in place for the flow of identifiable data

Purposes: ()

Sensitive: Sensitive

When:2017.06 — 2017.05.

Access method: Ongoing

Data-controller type:

Sublicensing allowed:

Datasets:

Children and Young People's Health Services Data Set
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Data Set
Local Provider Data - Acute
Local Provider Data - Ambulance
Local Provider Data - Community
Local Provider Data - Demand for Service
Local Provider Data - Diagnostic Services
Local Provider Data - Emergency Care
Local Provider Data - Experience Quality and Outcomes
Local Provider Data - Public Health & Screening services
Local Provider Data - Mental Health
Local Provider Data - Other not elsewhere classified
Local Provider Data - Population Data
Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set
Mental Health Minimum Data Set
Mental Health Services Data Set
SUS Accident & Emergency data
SUS Admitted Patient Care data
SUS Outpatient data
Maternity Services Dataset
SUS data (Accident & Emergency, Admitted Patient Care & Outpatient)
SUS for Commissioners
Public Health and Screening Services-Local Provider Flows
Primary Care Services-Local Provider Flows
Population Data-Local Provider Flows
Other Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)-Local Provider Flows
Mental Health-Local Provider Flows
Maternity Services Data Set
Experience, Quality and Outcomes-Local Provider Flows
Emergency Care-Local Provider Flows
Diagnostic Services-Local Provider Flows
Diagnostic Imaging Dataset
Demand for Service-Local Provider Flows
Community-Local Provider Flows
Children and Young People Health
Ambulance-Local Provider Flows
Acute-Local Provider Flows
SUS (Accident & Emergency, Inpatient and Outpatient data)
Local Provider Data - Acute, Ambulance, Community, Demand for Service, Diagnostic Services, Emergency Care, Experience Quality and Outcomes, Mental Health, Other not elsewhere classified, Population Data, Public Health & Screening services

Objectives:

ASH Status
To use data identifiable at the level of NHS number according to S.251 CAG 2-03(a)/2013 for the following datasets:
- SUS
- Local Provider Flows
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commission activity of one or more providers.
The NHS number is required to provide enhanced analysis of health care provision. This supports the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on analysis of patient data across health pathways.

Risk Stratification
To use SUS data identifiable at the level of NHS number according to S.251 CAG 7-04(a) (and Primary Care Data) for the purpose of Risk Stratification. Risk Stratification provides a forecast of future demand by identifying high risk patients. This enables commissioners to initiate proactive management plans for patients that are potentially high service users. Risk Stratification enables GPs to better target intervention in Primary Care

Pseudonymised – SUS and Local Flows
To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services. The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.
The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers.

Pseudonymised – Mental Health, Maternity, IAPT, CYPHS and DIDS
To use pseudonymised data for the following datasets to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services :
- Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS)
- Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS)
- Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS)
- Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS)
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT)
- Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS)
- Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS)
The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets.

No record level data will be linked other than as specifically detailed within this application/agreement. Data will only be shared with those parties listed and will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement. The data to be released from the HSCIC will not be national data, but only that data relating to the specific locality of interest of the applicant.

Expected Benefits:

ASH Status
1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, Integrated care and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Develop business models.
c. Monitor in-year projects.
2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.
3. Health economic modelling using:
a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets.
b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC).
4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5. Enables monitoring of:
a. CCG outcome indicators.
b. Non-financial validation of activity.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.
e. Case management.
f. Care service planning.
g. Commissioning and performance management.
h. List size verification by GP practices.
i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes.
6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers. .
7. A whole system approach including:
a. Deeper integration
b. Needs based pathway models
c. Pooled budgets
d. Community-based recovery-focussed models of support
e. Greater integration across mental and physical health and social care services
f. Integration with Local Care Organisations – promoting early identification and prevention of mental health patients
g. Develop a consistent set of shared minimum standards and outcomes.
h. Improve information sharing between agencies to facilitate collaboration and drive integrated care, through integrated patient records and/or patient ownership of information.
Risk Stratification
Risk stratification promotes improved case management in primary care and will lead to the following benefits being realised:
1. Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these.
2. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency readmissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services and early intervention of appropriate care.
3. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required.
4. Potentially reduced premature mortality by more targeted intervention in primary care, which supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework.
5. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics.
All of the above lead to improved patient experience through more effective commissioning of services.

Pseudonymised – SUS and Local Flows
1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, integrated care and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Develop business models.
c. Monitor In year projects.
2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.
3. Health economic modelling using:
a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets.
b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC).
4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5. Enables monitoring of:
a. CCG outcome indicators.
b. Non-financial validation of activity.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.
e. Case management.
f. Care service planning.
g. Commissioning and performance management.
h. List size verification by GP practices.
i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes.
6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers. .

Pseudonymised – Mental Health, Maternity, IAPT, CYPHS and DIDS
1. Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, Integrated care and pathways.
a. Analysis to support full business cases.
b. Develop business models.
c. Monitor In year projects.
2. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types.
3. Health economic modelling using:
a. Analysis on provider performance against 18 weeks wait targets.
b. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients.
c. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway.
d. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC).
4. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity.
5. Enables monitoring of:
a. CCG outcome indicators.
b. Non-financial validation of activity.
c. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG.
d. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.
e. Case management.
f. Care service planning.
g. Commissioning and performance management.
h. List size verification by GP practices.
i. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes.
6. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers.

Outputs:

ASH Status
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.

Risk Stratification
1. 1) As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The risk stratification presents pseudonymised data to the GPs. GPs are able to re-identify information only for their own patients for the purpose of direct care.
2. Output from the risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk.
3. Record level output will be available for commissioners pseudonymised at patient level and aggregated reports.
Pseudonymised – SUS and Local Flows
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.

Pseudonymised – Mental Health, Maternity, IAPT, CYPHS and DIDS
1. Commissioner reporting:
a. Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD).
b. Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD.
c. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD.
d. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD.
e. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD.
f. Provider reporting.
g. Statutory returns.
h. Statutory returns - monthly activity return.
i. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return.
j. Delayed discharges.
k. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting.
2. Readmissions analysis.
3. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence.
4. Production of project / programme level dashboards.
5. Monitoring of mental health quality matrix.
6. Clinical coding reviews / audits.
7. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level.
8. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.

Processing:

Prior to the release of identifiable data by North West DSCRO, Type 2 objections will be applied and the relevant patient’s data redacted.
ASH Status
1. North West DSCRO – part of the HSCIC –
a. Receives identifiable SUS data from the SUS Repository at the HSCIC.
b. Receives identifiable local provider data directly from Providers (as per Data Services for Commissioners Directions 2015).
2. Data quality management and standardisation of the data is completed by the DSCRO.
3. The DSCRO then securely transfers the following to the CSU:
a. The SUS data identifiable at the level of NHS number
b. The Local Provider data identifiable at the level of NHS number
4. The CSU ensures the addition of derived fields, linkage of datasets and analysis takes place and that the data then flows on securely to the Central Manchester CCG Data Warehouse. Additional analysis, production of reports and BI functions are completed.
5. Central Manchester then securely transfers the data to the CCG.

Risk Stratification
1. SUS Data is sent from the SUS Repository to North West Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) to the data processor.
2. SUS data identifiable at the level of NHS number regarding hospital admissions, A&E attendances and outpatient attendances is delivered securely from North West DSCRO to the data processor.
3. Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by North West DSCRO and the data identifiable at the level of NHS number is transferred securely to Arden & GEM CSU, who hold the SUS data within the secure Data Centre on N3.
4. Identifiable GP Data is securely sent from the GP system to Arden & GEM CSU.
5. SUS data is linked to GP data in the risk stratification tool by the data processor.
6. Arden & GEM CSU who hosts the risk stratification system that holds SUS data is limited to those administrative staff with authorised user accounts used for identification and authentication.
7. Once Arden & GEM CSU has completed the processing, the data is passed to the CCG in pseudonymised form at patient level and as aggregated reports.

Pseudonymised – SUS and Local Flows
Data Processor 2 – GMSS
1. North West Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) receives a flow of SUS identifiable data for the CCG from the SUS Repository.
2. Data quality management and pseudonymisation of data is completed by North West DSCRO and the pseudonymised data is then passed securely to Arden & GEM CSU for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data sets and analysis.
3. Arden & GEM CSU then passes the pseudonymised data securely to the Greater Manchester Shared Services (GMSS).
4. GMSS analyse the data to see patient journeys for pathway or service design, re-design and de-commissioning.
5. GMSS then pass the processed pseudonymised data to the CCG.
1. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression in line with the HES analysis guide.
Data Processor 4 - AQuA
1. North West Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) receives a flow of SUS identifiable data for the CCG from the SUS Repository. North West DSCRO also receives identifiable local provider data for the CCG directly from Providers.
2. Data quality management and pseudonymisation of data is completed by North West DSCRO and the pseudonymised data is then passed securely to Arden & GEM CSU for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data sets and analysis.
3. Arden & GEM CSU then passes the pseudonymised data securely to AQuA to provide support for a range of quality improvement programmes including the NW Advancing Quality Programme. AQuA identifies cohorts of patients within specific disease groups for further analysis to help drive quality improvements across the region.
4. AQuA produces aggregate reports only with small number suppression in line with the HES analysis guide. Only aggregate reports are sent to the CCG.
Data Processor 5 – Academic Health Sciences Network (Utilisation Management Team) (SUS Only):
1. North West Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) receives a flow of SUS identifiable data for the CCG from the SUS Repository.
2. Data quality management and pseudonymisation of data is completed by North West DSCRO and the pseudonymised data is then passed securely to Arden & GEM CSU for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data and analysis.
3. Arden & GEM CSU then passes the pseudonymised data securely to the Academic Health Service (Utilisation Management Team) (AHSN UMT)
4. The AHSN UMT receive pseudonymised SUS data for Greater Manchester patients. They analyse the data to look at processes rather than patients, for example, A&E performance, process times, bed days as well as ‘deep dives’ to support clinical reviews for CCGs.
5. AHSN UMT produces aggregate reports only with small number suppression in line with the HES analysis guide. Only aggregate reports are sent to the CCG.

NHS Bury CCG, NHS Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale CCG, NHS North Manchester CCG and NHS Oldham CCG have a collaborative information sharing agreement in place to share pseudonymised SLAM and SLAM Backup data between these CCGs only. SLAM data is included under Local Flows and is available under the Health and Social Care Act 2012.

Pseudonymised – Mental Health and IAPT
Data Processor 1 – Arden and GEM CSU
2. North West Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) receives a flow of data identifiable at the level of NHS number for Mental Health (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS) and Maternity (MSDS) North West DSCRO also receive a flow of pseudonymised patient level data for each CCG for Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT), Child and Young People’s Health (CYPHS) and Diagnostic Imaging (DIDS) for commissioning purposes
3. Data quality management and pseudonymisation of data is completed by North West DSCRO and the pseudonymised data is then passed securely to Arden and GEM CSU for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data sets and analysis.
4. Arden and GEM CSU then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the Central Manchester CCG Data Warehouse.
5. Central Manchester CCG complete BI functions, analyse data to see patient journeys for pathway or service design, re-design and de-commissioning and securely send to the CCG.
6. Aggregation of required data for CCG management use can be completed by the CSU or the CCG
7. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression in line with the HES analysis guide.

Data Processor 2 – GMSS (via DP1):
1. North West Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) receives a flow of data identifiable at the level of NHS number for Mental Health (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS) North West DSCRO also receive a flow of pseudonymised patient level data for each CCG for Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) for commissioning purposes
2. The pseudonymised data is securely transferred from North West DSCRO to Arden & GEM CSU for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data sets and analysis.
3. Arden & GEM CSU then pass the processed, pseudonymised and linked data to the Greater Manchester Shared Services (GMSS)
4. GMSS analyse and conduct the BI function and then send the Pseudonymised data to the CCG.
5. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression in line with the HES analysis guide.
Data Processor 4 - Advancing Quality Alliance (AQuA)
1. North West Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) receives a flow of data identifiable at the level of NHS number for Mental Health (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS).
2. Data quality management and pseudonymisation of data is completed by North West DSCRO and the pseudonymised data is then passed securely to Arden & GEM CSU for the addition of derived fields, linkage of data sets and analysis.
3. Arden & GEM CSU then passes the pseudonymised data securely to Advancing Quality Alliance (AQuA).
4. AQuA receives pseudonymised SUS data for Greater Manchester patients. They analyse the data to look at processes rather than patients, for example, A&E performance, process times, bed days as well as ‘deep dives’ to support clinical reviews for CCGs.
5. AQuA produces aggregate reports only with small number suppression in line with the HES analysis guide. Only aggregate reports are sent to the CCG.

NHS Digital Data Release Register - reformatted

NHS Manchester CCG projects

New application to link SUS data to GP and Social Care Data — DARS-NIC-272984-V0C5X

DSFC - NHS Manchester CCG  Commissioning, Risk Strat — DARS-NIC-47190-V7H9B

Project 3 — DARS-NIC-139079-M6P7X

Project 4 — DARS-NIC-122737-X2Y7F

Project 5 — DARS-NIC-120770-V1H9H

Project 6 — NIC-47190-V7H9B

DSFC - NHS Manchester CCG Commissioning, Risk Strat — DARS-NIC-47190-V7H9B